Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
The 1991 UPOV agreement extends the content of the breeders’ rights to the harvest product made from it, restricting to minimum the ancient rural usage of selecting, cleaning, conserving, re-sowing, changing, interchanging and selling seeds in the local market. This has real social consequences that...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5610003 |
| Source: | Revista la propiedad inmaterial, ISSN 1657-1959, Nº. 21, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-Junio), pags. 139-171 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001014894
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010148942016-09-14Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91Uribe Arbeláez, MartínUPOVITPGRFACBDTRIPSDecision 345plant breedersfarmers’privilegesui generis systemUPOVTIRFAACDBADPICDecisión 345fitomejoradoresprivilegio del agricultorsistema sui generisThe 1991 UPOV agreement extends the content of the breeders’ rights to the harvest product made from it, restricting to minimum the ancient rural usage of selecting, cleaning, conserving, re-sowing, changing, interchanging and selling seeds in the local market. This has real social consequences that jeopardize not only the rural economy, but also endangers alimentary safety and sovereignty. Article 27.3, paragraph b) of the trips ignores the CBD and ITPGRFA dispositions and other international instruments of the same or even superior hierarchy. Article 26 of Decision 345,1993, which only forbids the farmers’ privilege and the immemorial usages of the rural communities on plants species or asexual reproduction varieties, is has not been applied by Colombian authorities. The “facultative exception” that predicts the UPOV/91 version, it is true, purely symbolic. The 2001 INDIA’s law is an alternative that conciliates the plant breeders and the farmer’s rights as well as it recognizes the plant-improvement carry out by the indigenous or native and rural communities.El Convenio UPOV de 1991 extiende el contenido de los derechos del obtentor hasta el “producto de la cosecha” o el “fabricado” a partir de ella, restringiendo al mínimo la ancestral costumbre campesina de seleccionar, limpiar, conservar, resembrar, intercambiar y vender semillas en el mercado local. Esto tiene innegables consecuencias sociales que ponen en peligro la economía campesina, al igual que la seguridad y la soberanía alimentarias. El artículo 27.3 literal b) adpic ignora las disposiciones del CDB y el TIRFAA, y otros instrumentos internacionales de igual o superior jerarquía. El artículo 26 de la Decisión 345 de 1993, que sólo prohíbe el derecho de paisanaje y las inmemoriales costumbres de las comunidades campesinas en especies de plantas o variedades de reproducción asexuada, no es aplicado por las autoridades colombianas. La “excepción facultativa” que prevé la versión UPOV de 1991, es apenas un simple saludo a la bandera. La Ley de INDIA de 2001 es una alternativa que concilia los derechos del obtentor con los de los agricultores y reconoce el fitomejoramiento realizado por las comunidades indígenas o nativas y campesinas.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5610003(Revista) ISSN 1657-1959Revista la propiedad inmaterial, ISSN 1657-1959, Nº. 21, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-Junio), pags. 139-171spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista la propiedad inmaterial, ISSN 1657-1959, Nº. 21, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-Junio), pags. 139-171
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
UPOV
ITPGRFA CBD TRIPS Decision 345 plant breeders farmers’privilege sui generis system UPOV TIRFAA CDB ADPIC Decisión 345 fitomejoradores privilegio del agricultor sistema sui generis |
| spellingShingle |
UPOV
ITPGRFA CBD TRIPS Decision 345 plant breeders farmers’privilege sui generis system UPOV TIRFAA CDB ADPIC Decisión 345 fitomejoradores privilegio del agricultor sistema sui generis Uribe Arbeláez, Martín Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91 |
| description |
The 1991 UPOV agreement extends the content of the breeders’ rights to the harvest product made from it, restricting to minimum the ancient rural usage of selecting, cleaning, conserving, re-sowing, changing, interchanging and selling seeds in the local market. This has real social consequences that jeopardize not only the rural economy, but also endangers alimentary safety and sovereignty. Article 27.3, paragraph b) of the trips ignores the CBD and ITPGRFA dispositions and other international instruments of the same or even superior hierarchy. Article 26 of Decision 345,1993, which only forbids the farmers’ privilege and the immemorial usages of the rural communities on plants species or asexual reproduction varieties, is has not been applied by Colombian authorities. The “facultative exception” that predicts the UPOV/91 version, it is true, purely symbolic. The 2001 INDIA’s law is an alternative that conciliates the plant breeders and the farmer’s rights as well as it recognizes the plant-improvement carry out by the indigenous or native and rural communities.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Uribe Arbeláez, Martín
|
| author_facet |
Uribe Arbeláez, Martín
|
| author_sort |
Uribe Arbeláez, Martín
|
| title |
Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
|
| title_short |
Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
|
| title_full |
Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
|
| title_fullStr |
Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Derechos de los agricultores y convenio UPOV/91
|
| title_sort |
derechos de los agricultores y convenio upov/91
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5610003
|
| _version_ |
1709744346958397440
|