Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
The recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment sh...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608030 |
| Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 19-36 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001013923
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010139232016-09-14Reassessing dual Responsibility for International CrimesBonafé, Beatrice I.International CrimesIndividual and State ResponsibilityGenocide CasesCrimes InternacionaisResponsabilidade Individual e EstatalCasos GenocídioThe recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment shows that the conceptual framework explaining such relationship is now well settled. However, the Court seems to reach solutions that at times are not entirely consistent with the premises of such conceptual scheme. The purpose of the following analysis is to test the general theoretical approach with respect to a number of issues dealt with by the Court in its recent decision.A recente decisão da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso entre Croácia e Sérvia nos oferece a oportunidade de reavaliar a relação entre responsabilidade individual e estatal por crimes internacionais. Embora limitada ao cometimento de atos de genocídio, a sentença demonstra que o quadro conceitual explicando tal relação é ora bem definido. Contudo, a Corteparece chegar a conclusões que por vezes não são completamente consistentes com as premissas de tal quadro conceitual. O objetivo da análise é testar a abordagem teórica geral em relação a alguns problemas lidados pela Corte em sua recente decisão.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608030(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 19-36engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 19-36
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
International Crimes
Individual and State Responsibility Genocide Cases Crimes Internacionais Responsabilidade Individual e Estatal Casos Genocídio |
| spellingShingle |
International Crimes
Individual and State Responsibility Genocide Cases Crimes Internacionais Responsabilidade Individual e Estatal Casos Genocídio Bonafé, Beatrice I. Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
| description |
The recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment shows that the conceptual framework explaining such relationship is now well settled. However, the Court seems to reach solutions that at times are not entirely consistent with the premises of such conceptual scheme. The purpose of the following analysis is to test the general theoretical approach with respect to a number of issues dealt with by the Court in its recent decision.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Bonafé, Beatrice I.
|
| author_facet |
Bonafé, Beatrice I.
|
| author_sort |
Bonafé, Beatrice I.
|
| title |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
|
| title_short |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
|
| title_full |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
|
| title_fullStr |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
|
| title_sort |
reassessing dual responsibility for international crimes
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608030
|
| _version_ |
1709744331162648576
|