New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
Based on an “eco-systemic” democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutiona...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608027 |
| Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 255-283 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001013920
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010139202016-09-14New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of RiskCarducci, MicheleCastillo Amaya, Lidia PatriciaAndean ConstitutionalismRights of Nature“Good Life” ParadigmConstitucionalismo AndinoDerechos de la NaturalezaBuen VivirBased on an “eco-systemic” democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the “Gaia hypothesis” and legitimizes a real “social contract” among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an “object” of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal “subject” and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its “legal grantor and protector”.Sobre la base de una democracia “eco-sistémica” que busca conservar la biodiversidad a través del reconocimiento de la co-evolución entre naturaleza y cultura, el Constitucionalismo andino se presenta como la expresión de un constitucionalismo contra-hegemónico, en su apuesta por la construcción, mediante nuevos mecanismos participativos e interculturales, de una nueva institucionalidad que retoma la fórmula de la “hipótesis de Gaia” y legitima un verdadero y real “contrato social” con la naturaleza, identificando a ésta, no como un “objeto” de apropiación, explotación, o conservación, sino, como “sujeto” jurídico y fuente primaria de la sociedad misma y a la Constitución como su “norma jurídica de garantía”.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608027(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 255-283engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 37, Nº. 73, 2016, pags. 255-283
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Andean Constitutionalism
Rights of Nature “Good Life” Paradigm Constitucionalismo Andino Derechos de la Naturaleza Buen Vivir |
| spellingShingle |
Andean Constitutionalism
Rights of Nature “Good Life” Paradigm Constitucionalismo Andino Derechos de la Naturaleza Buen Vivir Carducci, Michele Castillo Amaya, Lidia Patricia New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk |
| description |
Based on an “eco-systemic” democracy that seeks to preserve biodiversity through the recognition of the co-evolutionary link between nature and culture, the Andean Constitutionalism emerges as the expression of a counter-hegemonic constitutionalism committed to the construction of a new institutional framework through the inclusion of new participatory and intercultural mechanisms. Departing from western constitutional paradigms, this groundbreaking constitutionalism revisits the “Gaia hypothesis” and legitimizes a real “social contract” among the people and nature, and instead of considering it as an “object” of ownership, exploitation, or conservation, it regards nature as a legal “subject” and primary source of society itself and the Constitution as its “legal grantor and protector”.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Carducci, Michele
Castillo Amaya, Lidia Patricia |
| author_facet |
Carducci, Michele
Castillo Amaya, Lidia Patricia |
| author_sort |
Carducci, Michele
|
| title |
New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
|
| title_short |
New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
|
| title_full |
New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
|
| title_fullStr |
New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
New Constitutionalism for Biosiversity vs. Neoconstitutionalism of Risk
|
| title_sort |
new constitutionalism for biosiversity vs. neoconstitutionalism of risk
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608027
|
| _version_ |
1709744329997680640
|