Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
The Supreme´s Court Decision of 20th of June, 2006 has upheld the original notice of appeal filed by seventeen neighbours of the Matanza- Riachuelo basin against the Federal State, the City of Buenos Aires and forty four private companies operating in the area. The High Court has admitted its origin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5582552 |
| Source: | Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 6 (Abril 2012), 2012, pags. 169-181 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001005155
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 6 (Abril 2012), 2012, pags. 169-181
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| description |
The Supreme´s Court Decision of 20th of June, 2006 has upheld the original notice of appeal filed by seventeen neighbours of the Matanza- Riachuelo basin against the Federal State, the City of Buenos Aires and forty four private companies operating in the area. The High Court has admitted its original jurisdiction over the subject of the prevention, redress and collective compensation as regards the right of living in a healthy environment according to section Nº 41 of the National Constitution. It is necessary to highlight that this paramount decision of the Supreme Court, which has been enforced gradually, but which has not been abandoned by the Court, implies a proof of inescapable public responsibility for the effective achievement of the Social State of Law of the Argentine People, in view of the permanent political powers’ failure in the fulfillment of their concrete constitutional duties. The Supreme Court`s solution to the Halabi case, has become a leading case which signals the beginning of the consolidation and development of collective processes. The Highest Court has made a steadfast advance in contrast to the silence of Congress, which has been unable to regulate collective processes during fifteen years. The Court has taken the historic cases Siri and Kot as the basis of jurisdiction and in this way; it has honoured the effective enforcement of rights and the idea that wherever there is a violation of rights, there should be a remedy
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Quiroga Lavié, Humberto
|
| spellingShingle |
Quiroga Lavié, Humberto
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente |
| author_facet |
Quiroga Lavié, Humberto
|
| author_sort |
Quiroga Lavié, Humberto
|
| title |
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| title_short |
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| title_full |
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| title_fullStr |
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| title_sort |
las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambiente
|
| publishDate |
2012
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5582552
|
| _version_ |
1709744168230715392
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010051552016-09-02Las nuevas circunstancias del amparo colectivo: protección del medio ambienteQuiroga Lavié, HumbertoThe Supreme´s Court Decision of 20th of June, 2006 has upheld the original notice of appeal filed by seventeen neighbours of the Matanza- Riachuelo basin against the Federal State, the City of Buenos Aires and forty four private companies operating in the area. The High Court has admitted its original jurisdiction over the subject of the prevention, redress and collective compensation as regards the right of living in a healthy environment according to section Nº 41 of the National Constitution. It is necessary to highlight that this paramount decision of the Supreme Court, which has been enforced gradually, but which has not been abandoned by the Court, implies a proof of inescapable public responsibility for the effective achievement of the Social State of Law of the Argentine People, in view of the permanent political powers’ failure in the fulfillment of their concrete constitutional duties. The Supreme Court`s solution to the Halabi case, has become a leading case which signals the beginning of the consolidation and development of collective processes. The Highest Court has made a steadfast advance in contrast to the silence of Congress, which has been unable to regulate collective processes during fifteen years. The Court has taken the historic cases Siri and Kot as the basis of jurisdiction and in this way; it has honoured the effective enforcement of rights and the idea that wherever there is a violation of rights, there should be a remedyLa Corte Suprema, en sentencia dictada el 20 de junio del 2006, hace lugar a un recurso originario interpuesto por diecisiete vecinos de la cuenca del Río Matanza-Riachuelo, contra el Estado Nacional, el Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, y contra cuarenta y cuatro empresas instaladas en la zona, por daños y perjuicios provocados por la contaminación ambiental que los demandados generan en dicha cuenca. El Alto Tribunal admite declarar su competencia originaria con respecto a las pretensiones concernientes a la prevención, recomposición y resarcimiento colectivo vinculado al goce de un ambiente sano, según lo establece el art. 41 constitucional. Debemos destacar que esta trascendente decisión de la Corte Suprema cuya implementación se ha venido cumpliendo en forma paulatina, pero que no ha sido abandonada por el Tribunal, implica un testimonio de responsabilidad pública inexorable para la efectiva realización del estado social de derecho de los argentinos, frente a la omisión permanente de los poderes políticos de cumplir con sus concretas obligaciones constitucionales. Al resolver el caso Halabi, la Corte Suprema ha dictado un leading case que marca el inicio de la consolidación y desarrollo de los procesos colectivos. El máximo Tribunal avanzó con decisión ante el silencio del Congreso, que en quince años no logró regular los procesos colectivos. De esta forma y apoyado en la doctrina de los históricos casos Siri y Kot, honró la fuerza operativa de los derechos y la idea que sostiene que allí donde hay un derecho violado debe haber un remedio para hacerlo valer2012text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5582552(Revista) ISSN 1853-0982(Revista) ISSN 1852-2971Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 6 (Abril 2012), 2012, pags. 169-181spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|