Expectations and attribution of responsibility
Pričakovanja in pripisovanje odgovornosti. Ob predpostavki, da vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti temelji na dejstvu, da je bilo prekršeno neko pričakovanje, avtor predlaga, da se pričakovanja razume kot družbeno sprejete standarde za ocenjevanje konkretnih dogodkov, ki omogočajo članom skupnosti iskan...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5333057 |
Source: | Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000899118
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008991182019-02-24Expectations and attribution of responsibilityFigueroa Rubio, Sebastiánexpectationsresponsibilityreactive attitudesobligationspričakovanjaodgovornostodzivne naravnanostiobveznostiPričakovanja in pripisovanje odgovornosti. Ob predpostavki, da vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti temelji na dejstvu, da je bilo prekršeno neko pričakovanje, avtor predlaga, da se pričakovanja razume kot družbeno sprejete standarde za ocenjevanje konkretnih dogodkov, ki omogočajo članom skupnosti iskanje razlage dogodkov, ki kršijo pričakovanja. Potem ko predstavi omenjeno razumevanje pričakovanj v luči zgornje predpostavke, avtor prouči, v kakšni zvezi so pričakovanja z odgovornostjo. Razpravo nato zaključi s predlogom, da zvezo med pričakovanji in odgovornostjo razumemo kot alternativo ideji, po kateri vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti predpostavlja kršitev neke moralne ali pravne obveznosti tistega, ki mu odgovornost pripisujemo.Under the hypothesis that every attribution of responsibility rests on the fact that an expectation has been breached, the author proposes to understand expectations as standards adopted by a community to evaluate specific events and allow the members of the community to search for an explanation of the events which breach expectations. After presenting this way of understanding expectations, their relationship with responsibility is analyzed, having in mind the mentioned hypothesis. To close the paper, the relationship between responsibility and expectations is explored as an alternative to the idea that every attribution of responsibility supposes the breach of an obligation, whether moral or legal, by who is held responsible.2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5333057(Revista) ISSN 1581-7652(Revista) ISSN 1855-7112Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility)engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility)
|
language |
English
|
topic |
expectations
responsibility reactive attitudes obligations pričakovanja odgovornost odzivne naravnanosti obveznosti |
spellingShingle |
expectations
responsibility reactive attitudes obligations pričakovanja odgovornost odzivne naravnanosti obveznosti Figueroa Rubio, Sebastián Expectations and attribution of responsibility |
description |
Pričakovanja in pripisovanje odgovornosti. Ob predpostavki, da vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti temelji na dejstvu, da je bilo prekršeno neko pričakovanje, avtor predlaga, da se pričakovanja razume kot družbeno sprejete standarde za ocenjevanje konkretnih dogodkov, ki omogočajo članom skupnosti iskanje razlage dogodkov, ki kršijo pričakovanja. Potem ko predstavi omenjeno razumevanje pričakovanj v luči zgornje predpostavke, avtor prouči, v kakšni zvezi so pričakovanja z odgovornostjo. Razpravo nato zaključi s predlogom, da zvezo med pričakovanji in odgovornostjo razumemo kot alternativo ideji, po kateri vsako pripisovanje odgovornosti predpostavlja kršitev neke moralne ali pravne obveznosti tistega, ki mu odgovornost pripisujemo.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Figueroa Rubio, Sebastián
|
author_facet |
Figueroa Rubio, Sebastián
|
author_sort |
Figueroa Rubio, Sebastián
|
title |
Expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
title_short |
Expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
title_full |
Expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
title_fullStr |
Expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
title_sort |
expectations and attribution of responsibility
|
publishDate |
2015
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5333057
|
_version_ |
1709743111581728768
|