Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
The paper addresses a contemporary Polish debate on the limits and functions of juristic interpretation of law. After presenting the main theses and features of Jerzy Wróblewski’s clarificative theory of juristic interpretation and Maciej Zieliński’s derivational theory of juristic interpretation, t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328969 |
| Source: | Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 27, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Emergence, Coherence, and Interpretation of Law) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000896951
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008969512019-02-24Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretandaGrabowski, Andrzejizomorfijaomnia sunt interpretandapravna normalegal interpretationclara non sunt interpretandaisomorphyomnia sunt interpretandalegal normpravno razlaganjeclara non sunt interpretandaThe paper addresses a contemporary Polish debate on the limits and functions of juristic interpretation of law. After presenting the main theses and features of Jerzy Wróblewski’s clarificative theory of juristic interpretation and Maciej Zieliński’s derivational theory of juristic interpretation, the author critically discusses various arguments (epistemological, ethical, empirical, historical, and practical) used in the debate. Finally, a tentative solution of the controversy, based on the criticism of Zieliński’s conception of legal norm, is proposed. It is argued that his conception is utopian and not recommendable, due to unacceptable conceptual and practical consequences.Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda. Brezkončni spor v poljskem pravoslovju? Članek obravnava sodobno poljsko razpravo o mejah in namenu pravnega razlaganja. Najprej so predstavljene glavne trditve in značilnosti pojasnilne teorije pravnega razlaganja, ki jo je razvil Jerzy Wróblewski, in izvedbene teorije Macieja Zielińskija. Nato so kritično predstavljeni različni argumenti za in proti vsaki od teorij: ti so spoznavoslovne, etične, zgodovinske in praktične narave. Na osnovi kritike Zielińskijevega pojmovanja pravne norme pa avtor na koncu predlaga svojo rešitev. Trdi, da je Zielińskijevo pojmovanje utopično in neprioročljivo zaradi nesprejemljivih pojmovnih in praktičnih posledic.2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328969(Revista) ISSN 1581-7652(Revista) ISSN 1855-7112Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 27, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Emergence, Coherence, and Interpretation of Law)engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 27, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Emergence, Coherence, and Interpretation of Law)
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
izomorfija
omnia sunt interpretanda pravna norma legal interpretation clara non sunt interpretanda isomorphy omnia sunt interpretanda legal norm pravno razlaganje clara non sunt interpretanda |
| spellingShingle |
izomorfija
omnia sunt interpretanda pravna norma legal interpretation clara non sunt interpretanda isomorphy omnia sunt interpretanda legal norm pravno razlaganje clara non sunt interpretanda Grabowski, Andrzej Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda |
| description |
The paper addresses a contemporary Polish debate on the limits and functions of juristic interpretation of law. After presenting the main theses and features of Jerzy Wróblewski’s clarificative theory of juristic interpretation and Maciej Zieliński’s derivational theory of juristic interpretation, the author critically discusses various arguments (epistemological, ethical, empirical, historical, and practical) used in the debate. Finally, a tentative solution of the controversy, based on the criticism of Zieliński’s conception of legal norm, is proposed. It is argued that his conception is utopian and not recommendable, due to unacceptable conceptual and practical consequences.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Grabowski, Andrzej
|
| author_facet |
Grabowski, Andrzej
|
| author_sort |
Grabowski, Andrzej
|
| title |
Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| title_short |
Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| title_full |
Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| title_fullStr |
Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| title_sort |
clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda
|
| publishDate |
2015
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328969
|
| _version_ |
1709743081508569088
|