Konceptualna jurisprudencija
This essay attempts to provide an accessible introduction to the topic area of conceptual analysis of legal concepts (or “conceptual jurisprudence”) and its methodology. I attempt to explain, at a fairly foundational level, what conceptual analysis is, how it is done (i.e. its appropriate methodolog...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | slv |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328967 |
| Source: | Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000896949
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008969492019-02-24Konceptualna jurisprudencijaHimma, Kenneth Einar conceptual analysisconceptual methodologythe nature of lawmetaphysics of lawpractical significanceconceptskonceptualna analizakonceptualna metodologijapriroda pravametafizika pravapraktični značajkonceptiThis essay attempts to provide an accessible introduction to the topic area of conceptual analysis of legal concepts (or “conceptual jurisprudence”) and its methodology. I attempt to explain, at a fairly foundational level, what conceptual analysis is, how it is done (i.e. its appropriate methodology) and why it is important in theorizing about the law. I also attempt to explain how conceptual analysis is related to other areas in philosophy, such as metaphysics and epistemology. Next, I explain the enterprise of conceptual jurisprudence, as concerned to provide an account of those properties that (1) distinguish things that are law from things that are not law which (2) constitute the former things as law, illustrating this explanation with what I hope are intuitive examples. Three different methodological approaches are also explained and evaluated. Finally, the practical importance of conceptual jurisprudence is discussed.U ovom radu nastojim da čitaoce uvedem u problemsku oblast konceptualne analize pravnih pojmova (ili „konceptualne jurisprudencije“) i njene metodologije. Pokušavam da, na prilično bazičnom nivou, objasnim šta je konceptualna analiza, na koji način se ona obavlja (to jest, njenu odgovarajuću metodologiju) i zašto je ona važna za teoriju prava. Takođe nastojim i da objasnim na koji način je konceptualna analiza povezana sa drugim oblastima filozofije, kao što su metafizika i epistemologija. Zatim, objašnjavam poduhvat u koji se konceptualna jurisprudencija upušta – da opiše ona svojstva po kojima se (1) stvari koje jesu pravo razlikuju od stvari koje nisu pravo, koja svojstva (2) prvopomenute stvari čine pravom. Pritom sam to objašnjenje ilustrovao, nadam se, jasnim primerima. Takođe sam dao objašnjenje i procenu tri različita metodološka pristupa. Na kraju sam razmotrio praktički značaj konceptualne jurisprudencije. | Ovaj je prijevod izvorno objavljen u knjizi Bojan Spaić i Damir Banović (ur.), Problemi savremene pravne i političke filozofije (Šahinpašić: Sarajevo 2016).2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328967(Revista) ISSN 1581-7652(Revista) ISSN 1855-7112Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility)slvLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revus: Journal for constitutional theory and philosophy of law, ISSN 1855-7112, Nº. 26, 2015 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Positivism, Conceptual Jurisprudence, and Attribution of Responsibility)
|
| language |
slv
|
| topic |
conceptual analysis
conceptual methodology the nature of law metaphysics of law practical significance concepts konceptualna analiza konceptualna metodologija priroda prava metafizika prava praktični značaj koncepti |
| spellingShingle |
conceptual analysis
conceptual methodology the nature of law metaphysics of law practical significance concepts konceptualna analiza konceptualna metodologija priroda prava metafizika prava praktični značaj koncepti Himma, Kenneth Einar Konceptualna jurisprudencija |
| description |
This essay attempts to provide an accessible introduction to the topic area of conceptual analysis of legal concepts (or “conceptual jurisprudence”) and its methodology. I attempt to explain, at a fairly foundational level, what conceptual analysis is, how it is done (i.e. its appropriate methodology) and why it is important in theorizing about the law. I also attempt to explain how conceptual analysis is related to other areas in philosophy, such as metaphysics and epistemology. Next, I explain the enterprise of conceptual jurisprudence, as concerned to provide an account of those properties that (1) distinguish things that are law from things that are not law which (2) constitute the former things as law, illustrating this explanation with what I hope are intuitive examples. Three different methodological approaches are also explained and evaluated. Finally, the practical importance of conceptual jurisprudence is discussed.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Himma, Kenneth Einar
|
| author_facet |
Himma, Kenneth Einar
|
| author_sort |
Himma, Kenneth Einar
|
| title |
Konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| title_short |
Konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| title_full |
Konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| title_fullStr |
Konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| title_sort |
konceptualna jurisprudencija
|
| publishDate |
2015
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5328967
|
| _version_ |
1709743080792391680
|