Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
This paper posits that there is a growing consensus on the need to reduce the powers of the Chilean constitutional court, while conceding that this issue has received little treatment to date. The general purpose of constitutional justice would be to do something particular, different from what gove...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5279159 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 35, 2015, pags. 201-241 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000875667
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008756672019-02-23Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilenaSolari Alliende, EnzoControl judicial de constitucionalidaddemocraciajustificación epistémicaconstitucionalismo débilJudicial reviewdemocracyepistemic justificationweak constitutionalismThis paper posits that there is a growing consensus on the need to reduce the powers of the Chilean constitutional court, while conceding that this issue has received little treatment to date. The general purpose of constitutional justice would be to do something particular, different from what government or congress does; namely to look out epistemically for the results of the democratic process. And a specific and contextualized defense of constitutional justice could lead to a form of weak and dialogic constitutionalism along the lines of the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalismEste artículo sugiere que se advierte un consenso en torno a la necesidad de recortar competencias del tribunal constitucional chileno, pero que la reflexión al respecto es aún poco desarrollada. Por eso, agrega que la justificación general de la jurisdicción constitucional tiene que argumentar que ella hace algo –velar epistémicamente por los resultados del proceso democrático– que no hacen ni el parlamento ni el gobierno, y que una justificación especial de la misma podría conducir a alguna forma de constitucionalismo débil y dialógico en la senda del nuevo modelo constitucional de la Commonwealth.2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5279159(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 35, 2015, pags. 201-241spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 35, 2015, pags. 201-241
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Control judicial de constitucionalidad
democracia justificación epistémica constitucionalismo débil Judicial review democracy epistemic justification weak constitutionalism |
| spellingShingle |
Control judicial de constitucionalidad
democracia justificación epistémica constitucionalismo débil Judicial review democracy epistemic justification weak constitutionalism Solari Alliende, Enzo Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena |
| description |
This paper posits that there is a growing consensus on the need to reduce the
powers of the Chilean constitutional court, while conceding that this issue
has received little treatment to date. The general purpose of constitutional
justice would be to do something particular, different from what government
or congress does; namely to look out epistemically for the results of the democratic
process. And a specific and contextualized defense of constitutional
justice could lead to a form of weak and dialogic constitutionalism along the
lines of the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Solari Alliende, Enzo
|
| author_facet |
Solari Alliende, Enzo
|
| author_sort |
Solari Alliende, Enzo
|
| title |
Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| title_short |
Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| title_full |
Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| title_fullStr |
Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| title_sort |
una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena
|
| publishDate |
2015
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5279159
|
| _version_ |
1709742772807794688
|