Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
In many countries, citizens have the power to propose new laws oramendments to their constitutions by popular initiatives. Provided that they have a special legitimacy, they are often regulated by different procedures to the legislation enacted by the legislature and may be used by their proponents...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5265506 |
Source: | Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 75, 2015, pags. 191-205 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000870049
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 75, 2015, pags. 191-205
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
Law
Direct democracy limits of popular initiatives fundamental rights comparative constitutional law Democracia directa límites de iniciativas populares derechos fundamentales derecho constitucional comparativo |
spellingShingle |
Law
Direct democracy limits of popular initiatives fundamental rights comparative constitutional law Democracia directa límites de iniciativas populares derechos fundamentales derecho constitucional comparativo Josi, Claudia Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California |
description |
In many countries, citizens have the power to propose new laws oramendments to their constitutions by popular initiatives. Provided that they have a special legitimacy, they are often regulated by different procedures to the legislation enacted by the legislature and may be used by their proponents to avoid the restrictions that the “ordinary” legislation is subject to. Recently, this has led that several popular initiatives which have come into conflict with the rights of minorities, fundamental rights of other affected groups, and other constitutional guarantees have been submitted. From the perspective of a comparative analysis, this article explores whether the laws in Switzerland and California set the procedural and substantive restrictions to this mechanism of direct democracy and to what extent. In this context, the author questionswhether the scope and enjoyment of fundamental rights may be subject to popular initiatives. Finally, several recommendations are made to improve the legal limits of popular initiatives and their control mechanisms to ensure that the scope and enjoyment of fundamental rights are not subject to the contentof popular initiatives.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Josi, Claudia
|
author_facet |
Josi, Claudia
|
author_sort |
Josi, Claudia
|
title |
Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
|
title_short |
Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
|
title_full |
Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
|
title_fullStr |
Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y California
|
title_sort |
democracia directa. ¿voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: análisis comparativo entre suiza y california
|
publishDate |
2015
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5265506
|
_version_ |
1727220305579999232
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008700492022-03-12Democracia directa. ¿Voluntad del pueblo versus los derechos fundamentales?: Análisis comparativo entre Suiza y CaliforniaJosi, ClaudiaLawDirect democracylimits of popular initiativesfundamental rightscomparative constitutional lawDemocracia directalímites de iniciativas popularesderechos fundamentalesderecho constitucional comparativoIn many countries, citizens have the power to propose new laws oramendments to their constitutions by popular initiatives. Provided that they have a special legitimacy, they are often regulated by different procedures to the legislation enacted by the legislature and may be used by their proponents to avoid the restrictions that the “ordinary” legislation is subject to. Recently, this has led that several popular initiatives which have come into conflict with the rights of minorities, fundamental rights of other affected groups, and other constitutional guarantees have been submitted. From the perspective of a comparative analysis, this article explores whether the laws in Switzerland and California set the procedural and substantive restrictions to this mechanism of direct democracy and to what extent. In this context, the author questionswhether the scope and enjoyment of fundamental rights may be subject to popular initiatives. Finally, several recommendations are made to improve the legal limits of popular initiatives and their control mechanisms to ensure that the scope and enjoyment of fundamental rights are not subject to the contentof popular initiatives.En muchos países, los ciudadanos tienen la facultad de proponer nuevas leyes o modificaciones a la Constitución mediante iniciativas populares. Dado que las mismas gozan de una legitimación especial muchas veces se regulan por procedimientos diferentes a la legislación promulgada por la legislatura y pueden ser usados por sus proponentes para esquivar las restricciones a las que la legislación «ordinaria» está sujeta. Eso ha llevado a que, recientemente, se han presentado varias iniciativas populares que han entrado en conflicto con los derechos de las minorías, derechos fundamentales de otros grupos afectados, y otras garantías constitucionales. Desde una perspectiva de análisis comparativo, este artículo explora si las legislaciones en Suiza y California establecen restricciones procedimentales y sustantivas a este mecanismo de democracia directa y en qué medida. En este contexto, cuestiona si el alcance y el disfrute de los derechos fundamentales pueden estar sujetos a iniciativas populares. Finalmente, este artículo hace ciertas recomendaciones destinadas a mejorar los límites legales de las iniciativas populares y de sus mecanismos de control para garantizar que el alcance y el disfrute de los derechos fundamentales no estén sujetos al contenido de iniciativas populares.2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5265506(Revista) ISSN 0251-3420(Revista) ISSN 2305-2546Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 75, 2015, pags. 191-205spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|