Autorregulacion del mercado de valores: profundizacion del mercado o relativizacion del control estatal
In the present historical conjuncture marked by a deep and complex international crises is particularly relevant to academic review of the classic tenets of free market favored by the lesser degree of state regulation in the markets, on the understanding that such state intervention creates ineffici...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2009
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5167597 |
| Baliabidea: | Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 2, Nº. 2, 2009, pags. 213-223 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
In the present historical conjuncture marked by a deep and complex international crises is
particularly relevant to academic review of the classic tenets of free market favored by the
lesser degree of state regulation in the markets, on the understanding that such state
intervention creates inefficiencies and distortions within them, who were called to generate
its own momentum of growth and balance.
Indeed, capitalism as economic model based on obtaining maximum profits and ownership
by private actors, has historically generated the need to correct market failures underlying
the model, which we call for action by the State which from the keynesian principles, with
their impact on the demand or supply to correct the faults that the system itself can not
overcome. So, the postulate of classical economics that markets with perfect information and
absence of government intervention are able to control itself, is seriously questioned in times
like the current global crisis.
In that vein, we are interested in this work from a critical perspective to analyze the figure of
self-regulation in the securities market, for time exploring its scope in the case of Colombia in
the light of the existing framework, to determine its validity and the challenges to be resolved
by this mechanism in the future.
The focus of analysis is the assumption of unusual powers and prerogatives as head of the
self-regulatory body, and link it to the state action regarding supervision of financial asset
markets. |
|---|