Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España

The comparative examination of judicial guarantees of the elections serves to reflect on their meaning and, more broadly, on the relationship between Electoral Law and Constitutional Law, and on Electoral Justice and Constitutional Justice. The Electoral Justice is inserted between constitutional gu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Díaz Revorio, Francisco Javier
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5124292
Source:Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional, ISSN 1138-4824, Nº. 13, 2009, pags. 223-266
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000806106
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional, ISSN 1138-4824, Nº. 13, 2009, pags. 223-266
language
Spanish
topic
Garantías electorales
garantías constitucionales
Derecho Constitucional
Tribunal Electoral
derechos político-electorales
control de constitucionalidad
Electoral guarantees
constitutional guarantees
Electoral Law
election
Electoral Justice
electoral jurisdiction
Electoral Court
political and electoral rights
judicial review
spellingShingle
Garantías electorales
garantías constitucionales
Derecho Constitucional
Tribunal Electoral
derechos político-electorales
control de constitucionalidad
Electoral guarantees
constitutional guarantees
Electoral Law
election
Electoral Justice
electoral jurisdiction
Electoral Court
political and electoral rights
judicial review
Díaz Revorio, Francisco Javier
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
description
The comparative examination of judicial guarantees of the elections serves to reflect on their meaning and, more broadly, on the relationship between Electoral Law and Constitutional Law, and on Electoral Justice and Constitutional Justice. The Electoral Justice is inserted between constitutional guarantees, geared to the preservation of political participation rights. The marked institutional differences between Mexican and Spanish systems of electoral guarantees highlight very different possibilities to organize a system of Electoral Justice. In Mexico, there is a specific electoral jurisdiction, who knows all the procedures on electoral matters, headed by an Electoral Court, which assumes the electoral guarantees, while the rest of constitutional guarantees are entrusted to the Supreme Court, existing two heads in the system of electoral guarantees. In Spain, in contrast, electoral processes are entrusted to administrative jurisdiction, leaving the «electoral amparo appeal» as subsidiary to the Constitutional Court, in which electoral guarantees and the rest of constitutional guarantees converge. All the options are acceptable if they serve the purpose of constitutional principles and fundamental rights guarantee, but it is necessary for a system of guarantees maintaining a consistent internal logic.
format
Article
author
Díaz Revorio, Francisco Javier
author_facet
Díaz Revorio, Francisco Javier
author_sort
Díaz Revorio, Francisco Javier
title
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
title_short
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
title_full
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
title_fullStr
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
title_full_unstemmed
Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-España
title_sort
justicia constitucional y justicia electoral: un examen comparado méxico-españa
publishDate
2009
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5124292
_version_
1709716130781724672
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008061062017-02-02Justicia Constitucional y Justicia Electoral: un examen comparado México-EspañaDíaz Revorio, Francisco JavierGarantías electoralesgarantías constitucionalesDerecho ConstitucionalTribunal Electoralderechos político-electoralescontrol de constitucionalidadElectoral guaranteesconstitutional guaranteesElectoral LawelectionElectoral Justiceelectoral jurisdictionElectoral Courtpolitical and electoral rightsjudicial reviewThe comparative examination of judicial guarantees of the elections serves to reflect on their meaning and, more broadly, on the relationship between Electoral Law and Constitutional Law, and on Electoral Justice and Constitutional Justice. The Electoral Justice is inserted between constitutional guarantees, geared to the preservation of political participation rights. The marked institutional differences between Mexican and Spanish systems of electoral guarantees highlight very different possibilities to organize a system of Electoral Justice. In Mexico, there is a specific electoral jurisdiction, who knows all the procedures on electoral matters, headed by an Electoral Court, which assumes the electoral guarantees, while the rest of constitutional guarantees are entrusted to the Supreme Court, existing two heads in the system of electoral guarantees. In Spain, in contrast, electoral processes are entrusted to administrative jurisdiction, leaving the «electoral amparo appeal» as subsidiary to the Constitutional Court, in which electoral guarantees and the rest of constitutional guarantees converge. All the options are acceptable if they serve the purpose of constitutional principles and fundamental rights guarantee, but it is necessary for a system of guarantees maintaining a consistent internal logic.El examen comparado de las garantías jurisdiccionales de las elecciones sirve para reflexionar sobre el sentido de las mismas y, más ampliamente, sobre la relación entre Derecho Electoral y Derecho Constitucional, y sobre Justicia Electoral y Justicia Constitucional. La Justicia Electoral se inserta así entre las garantías constitucionales, orientándose a la preservación de los derech s de participación política. Las acusadas diferencias institucionales entre el sistema de garantías electorales en México y en España ponen de relieve las muy diversas posibilidades de organizar un sistema de Justicia Electoral. En México existe una específica jurisdicción electoral que conoce de todos los procedimientos en materia electoral, encabezada por el Tribunal Electoral, que asume las garantías electorales mientras que el resto de garantías constitucionales recaen en la Suprema Corte de Justicia, produciéndose así una especie de «bicefalia». En España, en cambio, los procesos electorales se encomiendan a la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa, quedando el amparo electoral como recurso subsidiario ante el Tribunal Constitucional, en el que confluyen las garantías electorales y el resto de garantías constitucionales. Todas las opciones son aceptables si sirven a la finalidad de garantía de los principios constitucionales y de los derechos fundamentales en juego, pero es necesario que un sistema de garantías mantenga una coherente lógica interna.2009text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5124292(Revista) ISSN 1138-4824Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional, ISSN 1138-4824, Nº. 13, 2009, pags. 223-266spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI