A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
The Judiciary lies in the center of the main debates in the last decade. Such debates point to its crisis, wich arise the need of physical, personal and mainly political structural character reforms. The crisis intensifies whe observing the raise of the “private” character instances in the treatment...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5120226 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Brasileira de Direito), pags. 7-38 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000803602
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Brasileira de Direito), pags. 7-38
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Crise do Estado
jurisdição conflito State crisis jurisdiction conflict |
| spellingShingle |
Crise do Estado
jurisdição conflito State crisis jurisdiction conflict Spengler, Fabiana Marion A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social |
| description |
The Judiciary lies in the center of the main debates in the
last decade. Such debates point to its crisis, wich arise the need of
physical, personal and mainly political structural character reforms.
The crisis intensifies whe observing the raise of the “private” character
instances in the treatment of social conflicts and alongside,
the lost of space in judicial/state acting as a mediator, what becomes
a risk to democracy. The encouragement of these private instances
happens mainly becouse of the growing social complexity, pointed
by new roles developed that reflect, on the other hand, is shaping of
new and unusual realtions, wich the main consequence is the multiplication
of power centers. At this moment it is possible to see the
retraction and the mismatch between functional jurisdiction of the
State and its current conflictuous complexity. Emerged as a way to
guarantee harmonic and pacific coexistence among the individuals
members of the social groups, the jurisdiction (while state monopoly
of law application) appears and provide itself of coercion power.
This fact deviates/should deviate, progressivly, private justice, considered
as a guarantee of personal right execution.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Spengler, Fabiana Marion
|
| author_facet |
Spengler, Fabiana Marion
|
| author_sort |
Spengler, Fabiana Marion
|
| title |
A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| title_short |
A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| title_full |
A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| title_fullStr |
A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| title_sort |
crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade social
|
| publishDate |
2011
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5120226
|
| _version_ |
1709716122348027904
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00008036022019-02-23A crise do estado e a crise da jurisdição: (in)eficiência face à conflituosidade socialSpengler, Fabiana MarionCrise do EstadojurisdiçãoconflitoState crisisjurisdictionconflictThe Judiciary lies in the center of the main debates in the last decade. Such debates point to its crisis, wich arise the need of physical, personal and mainly political structural character reforms. The crisis intensifies whe observing the raise of the “private” character instances in the treatment of social conflicts and alongside, the lost of space in judicial/state acting as a mediator, what becomes a risk to democracy. The encouragement of these private instances happens mainly becouse of the growing social complexity, pointed by new roles developed that reflect, on the other hand, is shaping of new and unusual realtions, wich the main consequence is the multiplication of power centers. At this moment it is possible to see the retraction and the mismatch between functional jurisdiction of the State and its current conflictuous complexity. Emerged as a way to guarantee harmonic and pacific coexistence among the individuals members of the social groups, the jurisdiction (while state monopoly of law application) appears and provide itself of coercion power. This fact deviates/should deviate, progressivly, private justice, considered as a guarantee of personal right execution.O Judiciário encontra-se no centro dos principais debates nas últimas décadas. Tais debates apontam para suas crises, das quais emerge a necessidade de reformas estruturais de caráter físico, pessoal e, principalmente, político. A crise se intensifica quando se observa o aumento das instâncias de caráter “privado” no tratamento de conflitos sociais e, paralelamente, a perda de espaço da atuação judicial/estatal como mediadora, o que se converte em risco para a democracia. O fomento dessas instâncias privadas acontece, principalmente, em função da crescente complexidade social apontada pelos novos papéis desempenhados que se refletem, por sua vez, na conformação de novas e inusitadas relações, cuja principal conseqüência é a multiplicação dos centros de poder. Nesse momento, é possível perceber a retração e o descompasso entre a função jurisdicional do Estado e a complexidade conflituosa atual. Surgida como meio de garantir a convivência harmônica e pacífica entre os indivíduos integrantes dos grupos sociais, a jurisdição (enquanto monopólio estatal de aplicação do Direito) aparece e mune-se de poder de coerção. Este fato afasta/deveria afastar, progressivamente, a justiça privada, considerada como garantia de execução pessoal do direito.2011text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5120226(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Brasileira de Direito), pags. 7-38porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|