Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
With the Demirkan case the CJEU was called upon to clarify the scope of Article 41(1) of the Additional protocol to the EU - Turkey Association Agreement and affirm whether the Soysal and Savatli ruling was also applicable to the passive reception of services and, more specifically, to tourists. The...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4680634 |
| Source: | Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, ISSN 1138-4026, Año nº 18, Nº 47, 2014, pags. 285-299 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000772519
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, ISSN 1138-4026, Año nº 18, Nº 47, 2014, pags. 285-299
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
acuerdo de asociación CEE-Turquía
protocolo adicional artículo 41 párrafo 1 cláusula �standstill� obligación de disponer de un visado para la admisión en el territorio de un Estado miembro libre prestación des servicios derecho de un nacional turco para entrar en un Estado miembro a fin de visitar a un miembro de su familia y beneficiarse potencialmente de la prestación de servicios EEC-Turkey association agreement additional protocol article 41(1) �standstill� clause visa requirement for admission to the territory of a Member State freedom to provide services the right of a Turkish national to enter a Member State in order to visit a family member and potentially to receive services |
| spellingShingle |
acuerdo de asociación CEE-Turquía
protocolo adicional artículo 41 párrafo 1 cláusula �standstill� obligación de disponer de un visado para la admisión en el territorio de un Estado miembro libre prestación des servicios derecho de un nacional turco para entrar en un Estado miembro a fin de visitar a un miembro de su familia y beneficiarse potencialmente de la prestación de servicios EEC-Turkey association agreement additional protocol article 41(1) �standstill� clause visa requirement for admission to the territory of a Member State freedom to provide services the right of a Turkish national to enter a Member State in order to visit a family member and potentially to receive services Matera, Claudio Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom |
| description |
With the Demirkan case the CJEU was called upon to clarify the scope of Article 41(1) of the Additional protocol to the EU - Turkey Association Agreement and affirm whether the Soysal and Savatli ruling was also applicable to the passive reception of services and, more specifically, to tourists. The CJEU answered negatively and adopted a strict literal interpretation of Article 41(1). With this decision the CJEU affirmed that article 41(1) of the Additional protocol does not apply to services recipients and to reach this conclusion the CJEU emphasised that the EU -Turkey Association Agreement and protocol should be interpreted in the light of the context and objectives enshrined at the time of their conclusion. By doing so the CJEU adopted a formal method of interpretation that does not seem to take into consideration the status of candidate country of Turkey and that appears stricter than the techniques used by the CJEU in other cases. As a result of this tourists and other recipient of services from Turkey will have to keep on applying for a visa to enter the Schengen area until the visa liberalisation agreement enters in to force.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Matera, Claudio
|
| author_facet |
Matera, Claudio
|
| author_sort |
Matera, Claudio
|
| title |
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| title_short |
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| title_full |
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| title_fullStr |
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| title_sort |
tribunal de justicia de la unión europea - cjeu - judgment of 23.9.2013 (grand chamber) - case c-221/11 leyla demirkan v bundesrepublik deutschland - "association agreement with turkey - article 41 of the additional protocol - freedom to provide services - visa requirement". turkey association agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and turkish nationals wishing to entry in the schengen area cannot benefit from this freedom
|
| publisher |
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
|
| publishDate |
2014
|
| url |
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4680634
|
| _version_ |
1709715127353212928
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00007725192016-04-13Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - CJEU - Judgment of 23.9.2013 (Grand Chamber) - Case C-221/11 Leyla Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland - "Association Agreement with Turkey - Article 41 of the Additional Protocol - Freedom to provide services - Visa requirement". Turkey Association Agreement does not cover passive recipients of services and Turkish nationals wishing to entry in the Schengen area cannot benefit from this freedomMatera, Claudioacuerdo de asociación CEE-Turquíaprotocolo adicionalartículo 41párrafo 1cláusula �standstill�obligación de disponer de un visado para la admisión en el territorio de un Estado miembrolibre prestación des serviciosderecho de un nacional turco para entrar en un Estado miembro a fin de visitar a un miembro de su familia y beneficiarse potencialmente de la prestación de serviciosEEC-Turkey association agreementadditional protocolarticle 41(1)�standstill� clausevisa requirement for admission to the territory of a Member Statefreedom to provide servicesthe right of a Turkish national to enter a Member State in order to visit a family member andpotentiallyto receive servicesWith the Demirkan case the CJEU was called upon to clarify the scope of Article 41(1) of the Additional protocol to the EU - Turkey Association Agreement and affirm whether the Soysal and Savatli ruling was also applicable to the passive reception of services and, more specifically, to tourists. The CJEU answered negatively and adopted a strict literal interpretation of Article 41(1). With this decision the CJEU affirmed that article 41(1) of the Additional protocol does not apply to services recipients and to reach this conclusion the CJEU emphasised that the EU -Turkey Association Agreement and protocol should be interpreted in the light of the context and objectives enshrined at the time of their conclusion. By doing so the CJEU adopted a formal method of interpretation that does not seem to take into consideration the status of candidate country of Turkey and that appears stricter than the techniques used by the CJEU in other cases. As a result of this tourists and other recipient of services from Turkey will have to keep on applying for a visa to enter the Schengen area until the visa liberalisation agreement enters in to force.Con el asunto Demirkan el TJUE estaba llamado a clarificar el alcance del artículo 41 (1) del Protocolo adicional del Acuerdo de Asociación entre la UE y Turquía a fin de confirmar si el fallo en el asunto Soysal y Savatli era igualmente aplicable a la recepción pasiva de servicios y, de forma más específica, en el supuesto del turismo. Y a esta cuestión el Tribunal responde de forma negativa tras una estricta interpretación literal del artículo 41(1). De esta forma, el TJUE afirma que el artículo 41(1) del Protocolo adicional no se aplica a los beneficiarios de servicios, señalando que el Acuerdo de Asociación entre la UE y Turquía y su Protocolo deben interpretarse a la luz del contexto y de los objetivos en ellos inscritos en el momento de su conclusión. De este modo, el TJUE adopta un método formal de interpretación que no parece tomar en consideración el estatuto de país candidato de Turquía y que parece más estricto que las técnicas interpretativas utilizadas en el pasado. Como resultado de ello, los turistas y otros beneficiarios de servicios procedentes de Turquía deberán continuar solicitando un visado para entrar en el espacio Schengen hasta que entre en vigor el Acuerdo entre la UE y Turquía sobre la liberalización del régimen de visados.Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales2014text (article)application/pdfhttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4680634(Revista) ISSN 1138-4026Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, ISSN 1138-4026, Año nº 18, Nº 47, 2014, pags. 285-299engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|