Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
Until the year 2013 the term Conventionality Control had been used for 7 years in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Nevertheless, until March of that year, the Court had clarified little about how it understood that term. For first time in a Resolution of Monitoring of C...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Externado de Colombia
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5038863 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 33, 2014, pags. 149-172 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000769653
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00007696532018-02-20Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacionalCastilla Juárez, Karlos A.Control de convencionalidadgarantía de tratadosaplicación de los derechos humanosjurisprudenciaConventionality controlwarranty of treatyhuman rights applicationcase lawUntil the year 2013 the term Conventionality Control had been used for 7 years in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Nevertheless, until March of that year, the Court had clarified little about how it understood that term. For first time in a Resolution of Monitoring of Compliance with Judgment, the Court established a definition of Conventionality Control and the ways in which it can be used. Because of this situation, it´s necessary to make a new and complete jurisprudential recount in order to understand what the Inter-American Court is asking to the Member States of the American Convention to comply with. Furthermore, because academically the so called Conventionality Control has lacked comprehensive analysis due to the fact that the apparent doctrine has been built taking reference of only 4 or 5 isolated case law and not with the total 28 case law that, until July 2014, makes reference to the Conventionality Control. Thus this paper seeks to discuss and reflect, one more time, about the Conventionality Control rather than just repeat the provisions of the Court and of the dominant Latin American doctrine.El término control de convencionalidad llevaba siete años en uso en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos para el año 2013. Pese a ello, esta poco había precisado respecto a cómo entendía ese término hasta marzo de ese año, cuando por primera vez, en una resolución de supervisión de cumplimiento de sentencia, estableció una definición y las formas en las que se puede llevar a cabo. Ante esa situación, resulta imprescindible hacer un nuevo recuento jurisprudencial completo, a fin de conocer qué es lo que el tribunal interamericano pide que lleven a cabo los Estados parte a la Convención Americana. Más aun cuando académicamente el llamado control de convencionalidad ha carecido de análisis completos, al construirse una aparente doctrina a partir de cuatro o cinco jurisprudencias, y no de las veintiocho que hasta julio de 2014 desarrollan esa figura jurídica en la jurisprudencia interamericana. En razón de lo expuesto, en este documento se busca debatir y reflexionar sobre el llamado control de convencionalidad, en lugar de limitarnos a repetir lo establecido por la Corte Interamericana y por parte de la doctrina latinoamericana predominante.Universidad Externado de Colombia2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5038863(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 33, 2014, pags. 149-172spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 33, 2014, pags. 149-172
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Control de convencionalidad
garantía de tratados aplicación de los derechos humanos jurisprudencia Conventionality control warranty of treaty human rights application case law |
| spellingShingle |
Control de convencionalidad
garantía de tratados aplicación de los derechos humanos jurisprudencia Conventionality control warranty of treaty human rights application case law Castilla Juárez, Karlos A. Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional |
| description |
Until the year 2013 the term Conventionality Control had been used for 7
years in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Nevertheless, until March of that year, the Court had clarified little about
how it understood that term. For first time in a Resolution of Monitoring of
Compliance with Judgment, the Court established a definition of Conventionality
Control and the ways in which it can be used. Because of this situation,
it´s necessary to make a new and complete jurisprudential recount in order to
understand what the Inter-American Court is asking to the Member States of
the American Convention to comply with. Furthermore, because academically
the so called Conventionality Control has lacked comprehensive analysis
due to the fact that the apparent doctrine has been built taking reference of
only 4 or 5 isolated case law and not with the total 28 case law that, until
July 2014, makes reference to the Conventionality Control. Thus this paper
seeks to discuss and reflect, one more time, about the Conventionality Control
rather than just repeat the provisions of the Court and of the dominant
Latin American doctrine.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Castilla Juárez, Karlos A.
|
| author_facet |
Castilla Juárez, Karlos A.
|
| author_sort |
Castilla Juárez, Karlos A.
|
| title |
Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| title_short |
Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| title_full |
Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| title_fullStr |
Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| title_sort |
control de convencionalidad interamericano: una mera aplicación del derecho internacional
|
| publisher |
Universidad Externado de Colombia
|
| publishDate |
2014
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5038863
|
| _version_ |
1709715111647641600
|