El estado legislativo decimonónico
The formal sources of the law are legislation, custom or social practices and jurisprudence. But it is valid to raise a question if, in our country, all of those sources have the real and legal ability to generate rules of law, and to what extent they can achieve it. Or, if to the contrary, there is...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo |
Idioma: | Castellano |
Publicado: |
Universidad del Istmo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5042657 |
Fuente: | Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 11, 2014, pags. 16-27 |
Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000769407
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 11, 2014, pags. 16-27
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
Fuentes formales del Derecho
ley jurisprudencia costumbre hegemonía carácter decimonónico del Estado interpretación aplicación de la ley argumentación jurídica anti-pluralismo Formal sources of law legislation costume or social practices jurisprudence predominance State based on nineteenth-century characteristics interpretation of the law application of the law legal reasoning antipluralism |
spellingShingle |
Fuentes formales del Derecho
ley jurisprudencia costumbre hegemonía carácter decimonónico del Estado interpretación aplicación de la ley argumentación jurídica anti-pluralismo Formal sources of law legislation costume or social practices jurisprudence predominance State based on nineteenth-century characteristics interpretation of the law application of the law legal reasoning antipluralism Castellanos Howell, Alvaro El estado legislativo decimonónico |
description |
The formal sources of the law are legislation, custom
or social practices and jurisprudence. But it is valid to
raise a question if, in our country, all of those sources
have the real and legal ability to generate rules of law,
and to what extent they can achieve it. Or, if to the
contrary, there is a predominance of one over the
others, and if responded in the affirmative, if such
predominance is more an hegemonic position of one
source over the others. The legal regime of Guatemala,
following the legal tradition of the continental Europe,
in inserted in a generally acceptable principle that that
the legislation is the main source of law, in contrast
to the custom and jurisprudence, due to the political
and historical reasons that explain such position.
Notwithstanding, due to the reasons presented in this
essay, the opinion of the author is that, more than a
predominance, there is an overwhelming supremacy
of legislation as almost the only source of law over the
other sources, to such extent, that a so called
�anti-pluralist triangle of the sources of law� is
constituted in our legal reality, in detriment of a more
vivid and updated view of the law.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
author_facet |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
author_sort |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
title |
El estado legislativo decimonónico
|
title_short |
El estado legislativo decimonónico
|
title_full |
El estado legislativo decimonónico
|
title_fullStr |
El estado legislativo decimonónico
|
title_full_unstemmed |
El estado legislativo decimonónico
|
title_sort |
el estado legislativo decimonónico
|
publisher |
Universidad del Istmo
|
publishDate |
2014
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5042657
|
_version_ |
1709715108559585280
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00007694072016-09-16El estado legislativo decimonónicoCastellanos Howell, AlvaroFuentes formales del Derecholeyjurisprudenciacostumbrehegemoníacarácter decimonónico del Estadointerpretaciónaplicación de la leyargumentación jurídicaanti-pluralismoFormal sources of lawlegislationcostume or social practicesjurisprudencepredominanceState based on nineteenth-century characteristicsinterpretation of the lawapplication of the lawlegal reasoningantipluralismThe formal sources of the law are legislation, custom or social practices and jurisprudence. But it is valid to raise a question if, in our country, all of those sources have the real and legal ability to generate rules of law, and to what extent they can achieve it. Or, if to the contrary, there is a predominance of one over the others, and if responded in the affirmative, if such predominance is more an hegemonic position of one source over the others. The legal regime of Guatemala, following the legal tradition of the continental Europe, in inserted in a generally acceptable principle that that the legislation is the main source of law, in contrast to the custom and jurisprudence, due to the political and historical reasons that explain such position. Notwithstanding, due to the reasons presented in this essay, the opinion of the author is that, more than a predominance, there is an overwhelming supremacy of legislation as almost the only source of law over the other sources, to such extent, that a so called �anti-pluralist triangle of the sources of law� is constituted in our legal reality, in detriment of a more vivid and updated view of the law.Las fuentes formales del Derecho son la legislación, la costumbre y la jurisprudencia. Pero, es válido preguntarse si en nuestro país, todas ellas tienen la posibilidad fáctica y jurídica de generar normas de derecho, y hasta qué grado pueden hacerlo. O si, por el contrario, hay un predominio de una sobre las otras, y en caso afirmativo, si dicho predominio se constituye más bien, en una hegemonía de una sobre las otras. El ordenamiento jurídico en Guatemala, siguiendo la tradición jurídica europea continental, está inmersa en una visión generalmente aceptable que la legislación tiene un predominio sobre la jurisprudencia y la costumbre, por las razones políticas e históricas que lo justifican. No obstante ello, por las razones expuestas en este ensayo, el parecer del autor es que más que un predominio, existe una avasallante hegemonía de la ley, como fuente formal del Derecho, sobre las demás fuentes de ese tipo, a tal grado, que se llega a conformar lo que antojadizamente se da en llamar �un triángulo anti-pluralista de las fuentes formales del derecho�, en detrimento de una visión más viva y actualizada del Derecho.Universidad del Istmo2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5042657(Revista) ISSN 2305-9729Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 11, 2014, pags. 16-27spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|