El parlamentarismo en su encrucijada: Schmitt "versus" Kelsen, o la reivindicación del valor de la democracia
The economic crisis undermines the political legitimacy of parliament and even the whole democratic system. For this reason, we ought to stare the recent past and, especially, the interwar period in Europe and its controversial relationship between parliamentary model and democracy. Here, Schmitt...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales (España)
2013
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4527714 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista de estudios políticos, ISSN 0048-7694, Nº 162, 2013, pags. 113-148 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The economic crisis undermines the political legitimacy of parliament and even the whole democratic system. For this reason, we ought to stare the recent past and, especially, the interwar period in Europe and its controversial relationship between
parliamentary model and democracy. Here, Schmitt and Kelsen have represented the hardest clash between antagonist doctrines in the definition of democracy and its link with the crisis of parliament; and without a right knowledge about their successes and, even better, their many mistakes, it would be impossible to say nothing over democratic regeneration. Thus, we need to overtaken the dichotomy between democracy of identity and procedural democracy in a juridical order that cannot give up its substantial definition |
|---|