TJUE -- Sentencia de 05.05.2011, S. McCarthy / Secretary of State for the Home Department, C-434/09 -- "Artículo 21 TFUE - Libre circulación de personas - Nacional que siempre ha residido en el Estado miembro de su nacionalidad" -- Nuevos matices a la protección que ofrece el estatuto de ciudadano de la Unión

The Judgment of the CJEU (Third Chamber) regarding to the case McCarthy denies as a beneficiary of Directive 2004/38/EC and the application of art. 21 TFEU to a national of a Member State who has never exercised his right to freedom of movement and has always resided in the Member State of his natio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marín Consarnau, Diana
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales 2012
Subjects:
Libre circulación
ciudadanía de la Unión
posesión de la nacionalidad de más de un Estado miembro
situaciones puramente internas
discriminación inversa
Freedom of movement
Union citizenship
effect of being a national of another Member State
purely internal situations
reverse discrimination
Online Access:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4019363
Source:Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, ISSN 1138-4026, Año nº 16, Nº 41, 2012, pags. 221-236
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
TJUE -- Sentencia de 05.05.2011, S. McCarthy / Secretary of State for the Home Department, C-434/09 -- "Artículo 21 TFUE - Libre circulación de personas - Nacional que siempre ha residido en el Estado miembro de su nacionalidad" -- Nuevos matices a la protección que ofrece el estatuto de ciudadano de la Unión
Summary: The Judgment of the CJEU (Third Chamber) regarding to the case McCarthy denies as a beneficiary of Directive 2004/38/EC and the application of art. 21 TFEU to a national of a Member State who has never exercised his right to freedom of movement and has always resided in the Member State of his nationality, despite he is also a national of another Member State. The Court based the decision on the Article 3(1) of Directive 2004/38 which must be interpreted as meaning that that Directive is not applicable to that Union citizen and to the spouse. On the other hand, Article 21 TFEU is not applicable to a Union citizen in that ituation, provided that the situation of that citizen does not include the application of measures by a Member State that would have the effect of depriving him of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by virtue of his status as a Union citizen or of impeding the exercise of his right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States

Similar Items