Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey

The analysis of the legal issues raised by the Odyssey case might be addressed through various approaches: with regard to the most radical approach in terms of conflict of interest, it seems more appropriate to adopt, as starting point, a conciliatory position based on the idea that the access and d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goñi Etchervers, José Luís, Fuentes Camacho, Víctor
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4958038
Source:Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 28, 201416 pags.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000735226
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 28, 201416 pags.
language
Spanish
topic
Arqueología subacuática
conflicto de intereses
conciliación de intereses
Derecho internacional privado
ley aplicable
buque
carga
propiedad
abandono
ocupación
spellingShingle
Arqueología subacuática
conflicto de intereses
conciliación de intereses
Derecho internacional privado
ley aplicable
buque
carga
propiedad
abandono
ocupación
Goñi Etchervers, José Luís
Fuentes Camacho, Víctor
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
description
The analysis of the legal issues raised by the Odyssey case might be addressed through various approaches: with regard to the most radical approach in terms of conflict of interest, it seems more appropriate to adopt, as starting point, a conciliatory position based on the idea that the access and dissemination of the culture and the underwater archaeology are fully compatible with the existence of national historical heritage and the preservation of the cultural identity of the flag state. Within such problems, the Private International Law question relating to the determination of the law applicable to the litigious course will vary radically with regard to the solutions that will be dispensed by a Spanish court under the ship and cargo from being considered as a unit or separately. The significant differences arisen in the Odyssey case in comparison with other cases lead us to refuse the thesis which considers the shipment as a unit along with the vessel, as well as to consider the shipment itself as an independent element. Once discarded their qualification as cultural property under special protection in terms of art. 40.1 LPHE, the governing law should be ascertained according to the conflict-of-laws rule stated in art. 10.1 Spanish Civil Code; however, as a result of the impossibility of the application of the lex rei sitae , it seems to prevail the general criteria provided by the Spanish law as lex fori, which grants the right of the property to the discoverer of the abandoned goods.
format
Article
author
Goñi Etchervers, José Luís
Fuentes Camacho, Víctor
author_facet
Goñi Etchervers, José Luís
Fuentes Camacho, Víctor
author_sort
Goñi Etchervers, José Luís
title
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
title_short
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
title_full
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
title_fullStr
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
title_full_unstemmed
Otro punto de vista sobre el caso Odyssey
title_sort
otro punto de vista sobre el caso odyssey
publisher
Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
publishDate
2014
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4958038
_version_
1709714451948634112
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00007352262019-02-22Otro punto de vista sobre el caso OdysseyGoñi Etchervers, José LuísFuentes Camacho, VíctorArqueología subacuáticaconflicto de interesesconciliación de interesesDerecho internacional privadoley aplicablebuquecargapropiedadabandonoocupaciónThe analysis of the legal issues raised by the Odyssey case might be addressed through various approaches: with regard to the most radical approach in terms of conflict of interest, it seems more appropriate to adopt, as starting point, a conciliatory position based on the idea that the access and dissemination of the culture and the underwater archaeology are fully compatible with the existence of national historical heritage and the preservation of the cultural identity of the flag state. Within such problems, the Private International Law question relating to the determination of the law applicable to the litigious course will vary radically with regard to the solutions that will be dispensed by a Spanish court under the ship and cargo from being considered as a unit or separately. The significant differences arisen in the Odyssey case in comparison with other cases lead us to refuse the thesis which considers the shipment as a unit along with the vessel, as well as to consider the shipment itself as an independent element. Once discarded their qualification as cultural property under special protection in terms of art. 40.1 LPHE, the governing law should be ascertained according to the conflict-of-laws rule stated in art. 10.1 Spanish Civil Code; however, as a result of the impossibility of the application of the lex rei sitae , it seems to prevail the general criteria provided by the Spanish law as lex fori, which grants the right of the property to the discoverer of the abandoned goods.El análisis de los problemas jurídicos suscitados por el caso Odyssey puede ser abordado desde distintas perspectivas: frente a su más radical enfoque en términos de conflicto de intereses, nos parece más adecuado adoptar como punto de partida una posición conciliadora, inspirada en la idea de que el acceso y la difusión de la cultura y la arqueología subacuática son plenamente compatibles con la existencia de patrimonios históricos nacionales y la preservación de la identidad cultural del Estado del pabellón. Dentro de tales problemas, el de Derecho internacional privado relativo a la determinación de la ley aplicable al supuesto litigioso variará radicalmente en lo concerniente a las soluciones que le serían dispensadas por un tribunal español según el buque y la carga fuesen considerados como una unidad o por separado. Las significativas diferencias que presenta el caso Odyssey con otros asuntos nos llevan a rechazar la tesis que contempla el cargamento como integrante de una unidad con el buque transportador y a considerar el primero con carácter independiente. Descartada su calificación como bienes objeto de especial protección en el sentido del art. 40.1 LPHE, su ley rectora debería determinarse en virtud de la norma de conflicto general que se enuncia en el art. 10.1º Cc; pero al resultar impracticable la lex rei sitae designada por tal precepto, se impone el recurso a los criterios generales que suministra la ley española a título de lex fori, que reconocería el derecho a la propiedad del descubridor de bienes abandonadosAsociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4958038(Revista) ISSN 1697-5197Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 28, 201416 pags. spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI