Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
The fundamentally human experience of language and its heteronomy legitimizes thinking humans also as constitutively “legal” because law has in the prohibition and the imposition of duties their fundamental axes in involvement with others. The bonds between humans on these heteronomous basis in the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4925910 |
| Source: | Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD), ISSN 2175-2168, Vol. 6, Nº. 3 (Outubro - Dezembro), 2014, pags. 325-335 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000724859
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD), ISSN 2175-2168, Vol. 6, Nº. 3 (Outubro - Dezembro), 2014, pags. 325-335
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
direitos humanos
Alain Supiot linguagem Direito Homo Juridicus human rights Alain Supiot language law Homo juridicus |
| spellingShingle |
direitos humanos
Alain Supiot linguagem Direito Homo Juridicus human rights Alain Supiot language law Homo juridicus Henriques da Fonseca, Paulo Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot |
| description |
The fundamentally human experience of language and its heteronomy legitimizes thinking
humans also as constitutively “legal” because law has in the prohibition and the
imposition of duties their fundamental axes in involvement with others. The bonds
between humans on these heteronomous basis in the law, the contract and the statute
law, no gimmicks and serve from the close relations to dialogue and global hits in human
rights. The “noise” detected by Supiot are impeding the language of human rights as a
great foundation for a dialogical humanity immersed in an unstoppable process of globalization.
They are messianism, communitarianism and scientism, who radicalize biases
of political positions, Western cultural and scientifi c to the detriment of the “rest” of
the world. In addition, the individual subject model and legal rights that he ascribes, man
as Imago Dei (God’s image) reinforces a “secular” belief system which includes the Law
and the Western Science as a new religion, but without the inherent dogmatic opening
of Religion (re-ligare). These “noises” have shaped the law and negatively affected the
dialogical and multicultural character of human rights, historically generating a “misuse”
of the same. In this “misuse” of human rights, Supiot opposes the “good use” which
he defi nes as the open interpretation not only restricted to the laws, but that revolve
subjects, words and institutions “hard” that without this dialogical opening and interpretive,
not serve to the North-South dialogue or between such disparate peoples and
cultures. This article elected as its basis that traditional legal relationship (subject, object
and bond), once that it is consistent with the structure and discursive organization of
Supiot throughout the book and especially in chapter 6.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Henriques da Fonseca, Paulo
|
| author_facet |
Henriques da Fonseca, Paulo
|
| author_sort |
Henriques da Fonseca, Paulo
|
| title |
Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
|
| title_short |
Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
|
| title_full |
Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
|
| title_fullStr |
Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain Supiot
|
| title_sort |
vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo alain supiot
|
| publishDate |
2014
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4925910
|
| _version_ |
1709714379382980608
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00007248592019-07-18Vincular (unir) a humanidade: o bom uso dos direitos humanos, segundo Alain SupiotHenriques da Fonseca, Paulodireitos humanosAlain SupiotlinguagemDireitoHomo Juridicushuman rightsAlain SupiotlanguagelawHomo juridicusThe fundamentally human experience of language and its heteronomy legitimizes thinking humans also as constitutively “legal” because law has in the prohibition and the imposition of duties their fundamental axes in involvement with others. The bonds between humans on these heteronomous basis in the law, the contract and the statute law, no gimmicks and serve from the close relations to dialogue and global hits in human rights. The “noise” detected by Supiot are impeding the language of human rights as a great foundation for a dialogical humanity immersed in an unstoppable process of globalization. They are messianism, communitarianism and scientism, who radicalize biases of political positions, Western cultural and scientifi c to the detriment of the “rest” of the world. In addition, the individual subject model and legal rights that he ascribes, man as Imago Dei (God’s image) reinforces a “secular” belief system which includes the Law and the Western Science as a new religion, but without the inherent dogmatic opening of Religion (re-ligare). These “noises” have shaped the law and negatively affected the dialogical and multicultural character of human rights, historically generating a “misuse” of the same. In this “misuse” of human rights, Supiot opposes the “good use” which he defi nes as the open interpretation not only restricted to the laws, but that revolve subjects, words and institutions “hard” that without this dialogical opening and interpretive, not serve to the North-South dialogue or between such disparate peoples and cultures. This article elected as its basis that traditional legal relationship (subject, object and bond), once that it is consistent with the structure and discursive organization of Supiot throughout the book and especially in chapter 6.A experiência fundamentalmente humana da linguagem e sua heteronomia legitima pensar o ser humano também como constitutivamente “jurídico”, pois o Direito tem na proibição e na imposição de deveres os seus eixos fundamentais, na formação de vínculos. Os vínculos entre os seres humanos nessas bases heterônomas, no Direito, pelo contrato e a lei, não são artifícios e servem desde as relações de proximidade até o diálogo e acertos globais em direitos humanos. Os “ruídos” detectados por Supiot são impeditivos da linguagem dos direitos humanos como grande fundamento dialogal para uma humanidade imersa num processo irrefreável de globalização. São eles o messianismo, o comunitarismo e o cientificismo, que radicalizam parcialidades de posições políticas, culturais e científicas do Ocidente em desfavor do “resto” do mundo. Ademais, o modelo de sujeito individual e dos direitos subjetivos que a ele se adscrevem, o homem como Imago Dei (imagem de Deus) reforça um sistema de crença “laica” que inclui o Direito e a Ciência ocidentais como uma nova religião, mas sem a abertura dogmática ínsita da Religião (re-ligare). Esses “ruídos” plasmaram o Direito e afetaram negativamente o caráter dialogal e multicultural dos direitos humanos, gerando historicamente um “mau uso” dos mesmos. A esse “mau uso” dos direitos humanos, Supiot opõe o “bom uso” que ele define como a interpretação aberta não somente restrita às leis, mas que revolva os sujeitos, as palavras e as instituições “duras” que, sem essa abertura dialogal e interpretativa, não servirão para o diálogo Norte-Sul ou entre povos e culturas tão díspares. O artigo elegeu como esquema básico aquele tradicional da relação jurídica (sujeito, objeto e vínculo), pois é coerente com a estrutura e organização discursiva de Supiot em todo o livro e especialmente no capítulo 62014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4925910(Revista) ISSN 2175-2168Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD), ISSN 2175-2168, Vol. 6, Nº. 3 (Outubro - Dezembro), 2014, pags. 325-335porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|