Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
This article discusses the problematic and evading development of conscientiousobjection in the context of the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence. From a historical allusion to the famous case of the “Mayflower Pilgrims” –which serve as areference to the central problems that faces the objector–...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4809236 |
| Source: | Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, ISSN 0124-0579, Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2011, pags. 249-273 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000684758
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, ISSN 0124-0579, Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2011, pags. 249-273
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Jurisprudencia
jurisprudencia constitucional objeción de conciencia razón práctica aborto derecho a la vida conscientious objection practical reason abortion right to life objeção de consciência razão prática aborto direito à vida |
| spellingShingle |
Jurisprudencia
jurisprudencia constitucional objeción de conciencia razón práctica aborto derecho a la vida conscientious objection practical reason abortion right to life objeção de consciência razão prática aborto direito à vida Mora Restrepo, Gabriel Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva |
| description |
This article discusses the problematic and evading development of conscientiousobjection in the context of the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence. From a historical allusion to the famous case of the “Mayflower Pilgrims” –which serve as areference to the central problems that faces the objector–, it seeks to define the scopeof conscientious objection as a fundamental right (as a fundamental justice claim)in regard to the “factual” and “legal” possibilities for its exercise, for which there willbe a brief contrast between the most representative cases decided by the ColombianConstitutional Court in such matter. The core of the article is the idea that thereis an ideological prevalence that, unjustifiably, makes it difficult and in some casesdenies the exercise of the right to object in consciousness, particularly when it comes tothe right of life in regard to the abortion case.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Mora Restrepo, Gabriel
|
| author_facet |
Mora Restrepo, Gabriel
|
| author_sort |
Mora Restrepo, Gabriel
|
| title |
Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
|
| title_short |
Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
|
| title_full |
Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
|
| title_fullStr |
Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la deriva
|
| title_sort |
objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el mayflower a la deriva
|
| publishDate |
2011
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4809236
|
| _version_ |
1709713479597817856
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00006847582018-03-21Objeción de conciencia e imposiciones ideológicas: el Mayflower a la derivaMora Restrepo, GabrielJurisprudenciajurisprudencia constitucionalobjeción de concienciarazón prácticaabortoderecho a la vidaconscientious objectionpractical reasonabortionright to lifeobjeção de consciênciarazão práticaabortodireito à vidaThis article discusses the problematic and evading development of conscientiousobjection in the context of the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence. From a historical allusion to the famous case of the “Mayflower Pilgrims” –which serve as areference to the central problems that faces the objector–, it seeks to define the scopeof conscientious objection as a fundamental right (as a fundamental justice claim)in regard to the “factual” and “legal” possibilities for its exercise, for which there willbe a brief contrast between the most representative cases decided by the ColombianConstitutional Court in such matter. The core of the article is the idea that thereis an ideological prevalence that, unjustifiably, makes it difficult and in some casesdenies the exercise of the right to object in consciousness, particularly when it comes tothe right of life in regard to the abortion case.Neste artigo se aborda o problemático e ziguezagueante desenvolvimento da objeçãode consciência no quadro da jurisprudência constitucional colombiana. A partir deuma alusão histórica ao famoso caso dos “Peregrinos do Mayflower”, que serviráde referência aos problemas centrais que enfrenta o objetante, se procura delimitaro âmbito da objeção de consciência como direito fundamental (como pretensão dejustiça iusfundamental) em razão das possibilidades “fáticas” e “jurídicas” para se exercício, para o qual se fará um sumário contraste entre os mais representativos casos,sentenciados pela Corte Constitucional Colombiana. O núcleo do artigo o constitui aidéia de que existe uma prevalência ideológica que, injustificadamente, faz difícil eem alguns casos insidioso o exercício do direito a objetar em consciência, particularmentequando se trata do direito à vida no denominado caso do aborto.En este artículo, se aborda el problemático y zigzagueante desarrollo de la objeción de conciencia en el marco de la jurisprudencia constitucional colombiana. A partir de una alusión histórica al famoso caso de los “Peregrinos del Mayflower”, que servirá de referencia a los problemas centrales que enfrenta el objetor, se busca delimitar el ámbito de la objeción de conciencia como derecho fundamental (como pretensión de justicia iusfundamental) en razón de las posibilidades “fácticas” y “jurídicas” para su ejercicio, para lo cual se hará un sumario contraste entre los más representativos casos fallados por la Corte Constitucional Colombiana. El núcleo del artículo lo constituye la idea de que existe una prevalencia ideológica que, injustificadamente, hace difícil y, en algunos casos, nugatorio el ejercicio del derecho a objetar en conciencia, particularmente cuando se trata del derecho a la vida en el denominado caso del aborto.2011text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4809236(Revista) ISSN 0124-0579Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, ISSN 0124-0579, Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2011, pags. 249-273spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|