Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
The current work tries to present a general overview on arbitration and studies the recent reforms on the Spanish Law of Arbitration (Law 60/2003, 23rd December) by Law 11/2001, of the 20th of May. The autor will examine the evolution followed the recognition intrasocietario arbitration agreement...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Del Blanco Editores
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4572065 |
| Source: | Riedpa: Revista Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, ISSN 1989-3892, Nº. 3, 2013 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000670011
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Riedpa: Revista Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, ISSN 1989-3892, Nº. 3, 2013
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Arbitraje
CNUDMI Estatutario Arbitration Intraestatutario UNCITRAL |
| spellingShingle |
Arbitraje
CNUDMI Estatutario Arbitration Intraestatutario UNCITRAL Manga Alonso, María Teresa Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario |
| description |
The current work tries to present a general overview on arbitration and studies the recent reforms
on the Spanish Law of Arbitration (Law 60/2003, 23rd December) by Law 11/2001, of the 20th of
May. The autor will examine the evolution followed the recognition intrasocietario arbitration
agreement in the Spanish corporate law up to the Law 11/2011 of 20 May, amending Law
60/2003 of 23 December on Arbitration, which recognizes the intraestatutario arbitration
agreement. In the light of this recognition, exposes the advances incorporated by the legislator
and also their silences. Recognition of arbitration in the domes-tic corporate relations has been
very questioned not only in our country but also in neighboring countries such as Italy and
Germany, nonetheless in Anglosaxon countries where arbitration have no corporate restriction. In
our system, after a long vicissitude both doctrinal and jurisprudential, the Law 11/2011 has
dedicated the arts. 11 bis and 11 ter to incorrectly called statutory arbitration, leaving some doubt
as are: if ad hoc arbitra-tion is possible, about the lack of publicity of the arbitration claim, if is
necessary to award the notarization of the agreement declared null registrable, about the right of
partners to vote against the inclusion of the submission to arbitration. Finally, the work stand out
the convenience to make rules by the UNCITRAL to standardize divergences that still exist
between national laws in order to intrasocietario arbitration.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Manga Alonso, María Teresa
|
| author_facet |
Manga Alonso, María Teresa
|
| author_sort |
Manga Alonso, María Teresa
|
| title |
Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| title_short |
Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| title_full |
Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| title_fullStr |
Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| title_sort |
presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutario
|
| publisher |
Del Blanco Editores
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4572065
|
| _version_ |
1709712994208841728
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00006700112016-09-16Presente, pasado y futuro del arbitraje estatutarioManga Alonso, María TeresaArbitrajeCNUDMIEstatutarioArbitrationIntraestatutarioUNCITRALThe current work tries to present a general overview on arbitration and studies the recent reforms on the Spanish Law of Arbitration (Law 60/2003, 23rd December) by Law 11/2001, of the 20th of May. The autor will examine the evolution followed the recognition intrasocietario arbitration agreement in the Spanish corporate law up to the Law 11/2011 of 20 May, amending Law 60/2003 of 23 December on Arbitration, which recognizes the intraestatutario arbitration agreement. In the light of this recognition, exposes the advances incorporated by the legislator and also their silences. Recognition of arbitration in the domes-tic corporate relations has been very questioned not only in our country but also in neighboring countries such as Italy and Germany, nonetheless in Anglosaxon countries where arbitration have no corporate restriction. In our system, after a long vicissitude both doctrinal and jurisprudential, the Law 11/2011 has dedicated the arts. 11 bis and 11 ter to incorrectly called statutory arbitration, leaving some doubt as are: if ad hoc arbitra-tion is possible, about the lack of publicity of the arbitration claim, if is necessary to award the notarization of the agreement declared null registrable, about the right of partners to vote against the inclusion of the submission to arbitration. Finally, the work stand out the convenience to make rules by the UNCITRAL to standardize divergences that still exist between national laws in order to intrasocietario arbitration.El actual trabajo pretende exponer una panorámica general del arbitraje y analizar las recientes reformas operadas fundamentalmente en la Ley 60/2003, de 23 de diciembre de Arbitraje mediante la Ley 11/2011, de 20 de mayo. La autora se propone examinar la evolución que ha seguido el reconocimiento del convenio arbitral intrasocietario en el Derecho corporativo español hasta llegar a la norma citada, la cual reconoce el pacto arbitral, exponiendo los avances incorporados por el legislador y también sus silencios. Por extraño que parezca, el reconocimiento del arbitraje en el ámbito interno de las relaciones societarias ha estado muy cuestionado no solo en nuestro país sino también en países de nuestro entorno como Italia y Alemania, no en cambio en los países anglosajones donde el arbitraje corporativo apenas tiene restricción alguna. En nuestro ordenamiento, después de una larga vicisitud tanto doctrinal como jurisprudencial, la citada Ley 11/2011 ha dedicado los arts. 11 bis y 11 ter al impropiamente denominado arbitraje estatutario. Finalmente, se señala en el trabajo la conveniencia de que la UNCITRAL dicte reglas con pretensión de universalidad para uniformar las divergencias.Del Blanco Editores2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4572065(Revista) ISSN 1989-3892Riedpa: Revista Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, ISSN 1989-3892, Nº. 3, 2013spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|