O direito de greve nos debates da assembleia nacional constituinte de 1933-1934.

The aim of this article is to analyze the debates surrounding the right to strike in the National Constituent Assembly of 1933-34, in which the political implications of the strike itself were disputed during the deadlock between the state and workers before society. It is in this context that the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silveira Siqueira, Gustavo, da Silva Rodrigues, Julia, Soares de Azevedo, Fatima Gabriela
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Filosofia. Universidade Federal Fluminense 2014
Subjects:
Direito de Greve
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte 33
34
Constituição de 1934
Derecho de Huelga
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente 33
Constitución de 1934
Right to strike
1933
34 National Constituent Assembly
1934 Constitution
Droit de grève
Assemblée nationale constituante de 1933-1934
Constitution de 1934
Online Access:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4754927
Source:Passagens, ISSN 1984-2503, Vol. 6, Nº. 2, 2014, pags. 312-327
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
O direito de greve nos debates da assembleia nacional constituinte de 1933-1934.
Summary: The aim of this article is to analyze the debates surrounding the right to strike in the National Constituent Assembly of 1933-34, in which the political implications of the strike itself were disputed during the deadlock between the state and workers before society. It is in this context that the article seeks to analyze the arguments presented to the assembly, including how they were delivered and by whom, in debating the significance of the constitutionalization of such a right. The article aims to verify the hypothesis of the upholding of the right to strike as a right previously recognized by the Brazilian legal system, which, in the workers' eyes, merely required constitutional approval so as not to be even more violently opposed by the police. The work also thus seeks to understand the dynamics of the inclusion/exclusion of the right to strike from the 1934 Constitution, through the various profiles of the actors involved, the interests represented, the speeches given in the assembly and an analysis of the political-juridical context. Sources used include the proceedings of the 1933-34 assembly, its preliminary drafts, the final copy, as well as pertinent newspapers, books and dictionaries from the same period in which the research was undertaken.

Similar Items