Decisionismo e Hermenêutica Negativa: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen e a afirmação do poder no ato interpretativo do direito
This paper intends to reflect upon the legal interpretation theories presented by Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. It demonstrates that, however assuming different senses of decisionism, they end up generating a negative hermeneutics. For that, the theories made by Schmitt are analised in the 1910 year...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4697814 |
| Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 34, Nº. 67, 2013, pags. 111-137 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
This paper intends to reflect upon
the legal interpretation theories presented by
Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. It demonstrates
that, however assuming different senses of
decisionism, they end up generating a negative
hermeneutics. For that, the theories made
by Schmitt are analised in the 1910 years, period
still characterized by a neokantian focus;
in the 1920's, in the crisis of Weimar; and in
the 1930's, when Schmitt had accepted the
national-socialism. About Kelsen, the paper
discusses the two editions of Pure Theory of
Law (1934 and 1960). As a conclusion, it is
possible to affirm the insuficiency of the negative
hermeneutics. |
|---|