Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
Adjusting the legal status, and support policies for migrant workers is an issue on the agenda of international nstitution s for nearly a hundred years.The first efforts to protect foreign workers have been taken during the first session of the International Labour Conference in 1919. In the followi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | pol |
| Published: |
Grupo Eumed.net
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4690342 |
| Source: | Revista Crítica de la Historia de las Relaciones Laborales y de la Política Social, ISSN 2173-0822, Nº. 6, 2013, pag. 1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000643839
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Crítica de la Historia de las Relaciones Laborales y de la Política Social, ISSN 2173-0822, Nº. 6, 2013, pag. 1
|
| language |
pol
|
| topic |
International labour law
Employment International migration law Migrant workers Labour migration Public international law Human rights law International migration United Nations Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) Illegal migration Undocumented migration |
| spellingShingle |
International labour law
Employment International migration law Migrant workers Labour migration Public international law Human rights law International migration United Nations Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) Illegal migration Undocumented migration Terminski, Bogumil Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc |
| description |
Adjusting the legal status, and support policies for migrant workers is an issue on the agenda of international nstitution
s for nearly a hundred years.The first efforts to protect foreign workers have been taken during the first session of the International Labour Conference in 1919. In the following decades ILO activities has led to the preparation o f three international documents concerning this issue (non-binding ILO Convention No. 66 in 1939,and Convention No. 97 of 1949, and No. 143 of 1975). For many decades, the problem of the protection of migrant workers� rights was considered as a narrow issue of international labor law. Codification efforts, undertaken during seventies, have led to the adaptation of the UN document (International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families) in 1990, and inclusion this issue into more general area of international human rights law. Despite this fact, and the existence of several categories of documents concerning migrant workers within Council of Europe, the European Union, and even ASEAN, the protection of migrant workers has never been effectively functioning system. The aim of this article is the analysis of the codification of that issue, and the main obstacles to consensus on the protection of migrant workers� rights. The state parties of the UN Convention contain primarily countries of origin of migrants (such as Mexico, Morocco and the Philippines). It seems, therefore, that despite 46 ratifications the, UN
convention does not have a global character, and activities of its monitoring body (Committee on Migrant Workers
CMW) reflects primarily demands of sending countries. The article closely examines particularly controversial
provisions of the ILO and UN documents from the point of view of current labour migrations and policies of sending and host countries.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Terminski, Bogumil
|
| author_facet |
Terminski, Bogumil
|
| author_sort |
Terminski, Bogumil
|
| title |
Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| title_short |
Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| title_full |
Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| title_fullStr |
Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| title_sort |
miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztosc
|
| publisher |
Grupo Eumed.net
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4690342
|
| _version_ |
1709712569497812992
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00006438392016-09-16Miedzynarodowa ochrona pracowników migrujacych: Wspótczesne debaty prawne i perspektywy na przysztoscTerminski, BogumilInternational labour lawEmploymentInternational migration lawMigrant workersLabour migrationPublic international lawHuman rights lawInternational migrationUnited NationsCommittee on Migrant Workers (CMW)Illegal migrationUndocumented migrationAdjusting the legal status, and support policies for migrant workers is an issue on the agenda of international nstitution s for nearly a hundred years.The first efforts to protect foreign workers have been taken during the first session of the International Labour Conference in 1919. In the following decades ILO activities has led to the preparation o f three international documents concerning this issue (non-binding ILO Convention No. 66 in 1939,and Convention No. 97 of 1949, and No. 143 of 1975). For many decades, the problem of the protection of migrant workers� rights was considered as a narrow issue of international labor law. Codification efforts, undertaken during seventies, have led to the adaptation of the UN document (International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families) in 1990, and inclusion this issue into more general area of international human rights law. Despite this fact, and the existence of several categories of documents concerning migrant workers within Council of Europe, the European Union, and even ASEAN, the protection of migrant workers has never been effectively functioning system. The aim of this article is the analysis of the codification of that issue, and the main obstacles to consensus on the protection of migrant workers� rights. The state parties of the UN Convention contain primarily countries of origin of migrants (such as Mexico, Morocco and the Philippines). It seems, therefore, that despite 46 ratifications the, UN convention does not have a global character, and activities of its monitoring body (Committee on Migrant Workers CMW) reflects primarily demands of sending countries. The article closely examines particularly controversial provisions of the ILO and UN documents from the point of view of current labour migrations and policies of sending and host countries.Regulacja statusu prawnego, oraz zasad wsparcia pracowników migrujcych, jest zagadnieniem podejmowanym na forach instytucji midzynarodowych od niemal stu lat. Pierwsze wysi?ki na rzecz ochrony imigrantów zarobkowych podjto ju podczas pierwszej sesji Midzynarodowej Konferencji Pracy w 1919 roku. Aktywno MOP w kolejnych dekadach doprowadzi?a do przygotowania a trzech dokumentów powiconych temu zagadnieniu (nieobowzujcej konwencji MOP nr 66 z 1939 r., oraz wencji Nr 97 z 1949 roku i Nr 143 z 1975 r.). Przez wieledekad problem ochrony imigrantów zarobkowych by? uznawany za wskie zagadnienie midzynarodowego prawa pracy. Podjte w latach siedemdziesitych prace kodyfikacyjne doprowadzi?y do przyjcia w 1990 roku dokumentu ONZ (Midzynarodowa Konwencja Dotyczca Ochrony Praw Wszystkich Pracowników Migrujcych i Cz?onków Ich Rodzin), oraz w?czenia tegozagadnienia do bardziej ogólnej przestrzeni praw cz?owieka. Pomimo wspomnianego faktu, a take istnienia rónych kategorii dokumentów powiconych migracjom zarobkowym w ramach Radyuropy, Unii Europejskiej, Organizacji Pastwa Amerykaskich (OPA), Ligi PastwArabskich a nawet ASEAN, ochrona pracowników migruj cych nigdy nie sta?a siefektywnie funkcjonujcym systemem pomocy i wsparcia wspomnianej tukategorii cudzoziemców. Przedmiot wspomnianego artyku?u stanowi analizakodyfikacji zagadnienia, oraz podstawowych przeszkód utrudniaj cych szerokikonsensus w zakresie ochrony pracowników migrujcych. Sygnatariuszami konwencji ONZ sobecnie prawie wy? cznie kraje globalnego po?udnia. Oczywiste wydaje si zatem, e pomimo 46 ratyfikacji dokument ten nie ma globalnego charakteru, a dzia?alno komitetu monitorujcego jego implementacj(CMW) odzwierciedla wy? cznie postulaty krajów eksportujcychtani si?robocz . Prezentowany artyku? dok?adnie analizuje szczególnie kontrowersyjne zapisy dokumentów MOP i ONZ z perspektywy obecnejspecyfiki migracji zarobkowych nawiecie, oraz wewn trznych politykmigracyjnych krajów eksportujcych i przyjmujcych migrantów.Grupo Eumed.net2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4690342(Revista) ISSN 2386-6039(Revista) ISSN 2173-0822Revista Crítica de la Historia de las Relaciones Laborales y de la Política Social, ISSN 2173-0822, Nº. 6, 2013, pag. 1polLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|