De Maquiavelo al Estado postmoderno: Paradigmas políticos de aproximación al fenómeno estatal
This paper makes a summary of the developments in the canonical readings of the State as a political object, from a multidisciplinary perspective. The starting point is the process of secularization in the study of the State, driven by Machiavelli with the publication of The Prince in the early sixt...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | French |
Published: |
Universidad Externado de Colombia
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4272692 |
Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 29, 2012, pags. 107-144 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
This paper makes a summary of the developments in the canonical readings
of the State as a political object, from a multidisciplinary perspective. The
starting point is the process of secularization in the study of the State, driven
by Machiavelli with the publication of The Prince in the early sixteenth
century. Subsequently it explores: (1) the seminal contribution of juridical
thought and political philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
in the construction of societal perceptions of the State, until the emergence
of the �Rule of Law� model; (2) the changes that the democratic revolution
meant for the phenomenon of the State; (3) the renewing effect on the research
agenda over the last three decades of studies on the transformation
of political regimes, the development of welfare states, social capital and
democratic effectiveness; (4) the new epistemological paths traced by globalization,
neo-constitutionalism and public policy analysis. The text concludes
with a reflection on the future of the nation-state and democracy models,
currently prevalent, for the organization and exercising of power; and on the
characteristics of the new scientific paradigm conveyed by the discourse of
failed states. The concise nature of the article naturally excludes any claim
of being exhaustive; rather, it focuses on the most relevant mutations of the
conceptual tools used in State analysis. |
---|