El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
The questioning and cross is one of the most important skills that must handle a good lawyer, knowing how to approach those witnesses, both their own and others, how we will use the tool of the questions, this assumes it scientifi cally. There are basic rules to be observed among them, that everyone...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad de Costa Rica. Colegio de Abogados de Costa Rica
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4157327 |
| Source: | El Foro, ISSN 1659-1496, Nº. 12, 2012, pags. 90-101 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000536828
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00005368282016-04-13El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa RicaSolórzano Sánchez, RodolfoEl interrogatorio y contrainterrogatoriodestrezas de litigaciónla herramienta del litigante: Las preguntasla teoría del casocontrolaradversar o dar un punto de vista alternativoProcesal Penal por audienciaslitigantestestimoniostransmitir la informaciónimparcialidadThe cross-questioning andlitigation skillsthe tool of the trial: Questionsthe theory of the casecheckadversityor give an alternative viewpointcriminal Procedural hearingstrialtestimonialsto transmit the informationimpartialityThe questioning and cross is one of the most important skills that must handle a good lawyer, knowing how to approach those witnesses, both their own and others, how we will use the tool of the questions, this assumes it scientifi cally. There are basic rules to be observed among them, that everyone litigant must have a theory of the case, which is the assumption that each intervening raised about how the facts and law enforcement, thereby preparing a proposal known claim, which aims to become the raw material for the decision, foundation and intellective so argued the evidence to be presented and disposed of in the debate, for carrying out the three elements that presents a model procedure for hearings: control , adversity, or give alternative view.El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio es una de las destrezas más importantes que debe manejar un buen abogado, saber cómo abordar a las personas testigos, tanto propios como ajenos; cómo vamos a utilizar la herramienta de las preguntas, presupone hacerlo científi camente. Hay reglas básicas que se deben respetar entre ellas, que toda persona litigante, debe tener, una teoría del caso, que es la hipótesis que cada interviniente plantea sobre la forma en que ocurrieron los hechos y la aplicación del derecho, elaborando con ello una propuesta denominada pretensión, que tiene como objetivo transformarse en la materia prima para la decisión, todo fundamentado y argumentado de manera intelectiva con las pruebas que se presentarán y evacuarán en el debate; para poder efectuar los tres elementos que plantea un modelo procesal por audiencias: controlar, adversar o dar un punto de vista alternativo.Universidad de Costa Rica. Colegio de Abogados de Costa Rica2012text (article)application/pdfhttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4157327(Revista) ISSN 1659-1496El Foro, ISSN 1659-1496, Nº. 12, 2012, pags. 90-101spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
El Foro, ISSN 1659-1496, Nº. 12, 2012, pags. 90-101
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio
destrezas de litigación la herramienta del litigante: Las preguntas la teoría del caso controlar adversar o dar un punto de vista alternativo Procesal Penal por audiencias litigantes testimonios transmitir la información imparcialidad The cross-questioning and litigation skills the tool of the trial: Questions the theory of the case check adversity or give an alternative viewpoint criminal Procedural hearings trial testimonials to transmit the information impartiality |
| spellingShingle |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio
destrezas de litigación la herramienta del litigante: Las preguntas la teoría del caso controlar adversar o dar un punto de vista alternativo Procesal Penal por audiencias litigantes testimonios transmitir la información imparcialidad The cross-questioning and litigation skills the tool of the trial: Questions the theory of the case check adversity or give an alternative viewpoint criminal Procedural hearings trial testimonials to transmit the information impartiality Solórzano Sánchez, Rodolfo El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica |
| description |
The questioning and cross is one of the most important
skills that must handle a good lawyer, knowing how
to approach those witnesses, both their own and others,
how we will use the tool of the questions, this assumes it
scientifi cally. There are basic rules to be observed among
them, that everyone litigant must have a theory of the
case, which is the assumption that each intervening raised
about how the facts and law enforcement, thereby
preparing a proposal known claim, which aims to become
the raw material for the decision, foundation and
intellective so argued the evidence to be presented and
disposed of in the debate, for carrying out the three elements
that presents a model procedure for hearings: control
, adversity, or give alternative view.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Solórzano Sánchez, Rodolfo
|
| author_facet |
Solórzano Sánchez, Rodolfo
|
| author_sort |
Solórzano Sánchez, Rodolfo
|
| title |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
|
| title_short |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
|
| title_full |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
|
| title_fullStr |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en Costa Rica
|
| title_sort |
el interrogatorio y contrainterrogatorio en costa rica
|
| publisher |
Universidad de Costa Rica. Colegio de Abogados de Costa Rica
|
| publishDate |
2012
|
| url |
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4157327
|
| _version_ |
1709710977327431680
|