La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia

On June 10, 2011 the execution of the Victims Law was launched, with the purpose of attending, assisting, and repairing the victims of the internal armed conflict. The implementation of the law and the constitutional precedent established in Judgment C-330 of 2016, certain situations or conditions t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rueda Lázaro, Jesús Manuel, López Niño, Giovanni Enrique, Casadiegos Santana, Martín Humberto
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8702318
Source:Academia & Derecho, ISSN 2539-4983, null 13, Nº. 24, 2022
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001563024
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Academia & Derecho, ISSN 2539-4983, null 13, Nº. 24, 2022
language
Spanish
topic
Inmutabilidad de la sentencia restitutiva
Instituciones jurídico-procesales
Reparación integral
Restitución de tierras
Segundo ocupante
Immutability of the restitutive sentence
Procedural legal institutions
holistic reparation
Land restitution
Second occupant
spellingShingle
Inmutabilidad de la sentencia restitutiva
Instituciones jurídico-procesales
Reparación integral
Restitución de tierras
Segundo ocupante
Immutability of the restitutive sentence
Procedural legal institutions
holistic reparation
Land restitution
Second occupant
Rueda Lázaro, Jesús Manuel
López Niño, Giovanni Enrique
Casadiegos Santana, Martín Humberto
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
description
On June 10, 2011 the execution of the Victims Law was launched, with the purpose of attending, assisting, and repairing the victims of the internal armed conflict. The implementation of the law and the constitutional precedent established in Judgment C-330 of 2016, certain situations or conditions that were not foreseen by the legislator became evident, especially, the ignorance of a heterogeneous group known as second occupants and the omission of post-judgment institutions for its recognition and comprehensive reparation. This problem academically motivated the beginning of a research process, based on the question, ¿how to materialize the integral reparation of the second occupants, unknown by judicial sentence, prior to the constitutional precedent C-330 of 2016 by the land judge? To answer this question, the procedural laws and the extended jurisdiction of land restitution judges must be considered, as well as the fact that sentences are immutable and irrevocable. The research problem is answered by applying legal hermeneutics, from its formal idealistic philosophical current, through the systematic method and the technique of integration by induction to analyze the applicability of the extraordinary appeal for review, the constitutional mechanism of protection, the modulation of constitutional sentences and the addition of sentences of the General Code of the Process, which allows us to suggest some aspects to make the institutions more flexible, taking into account the differential approach of the law and the quality of the benefactor subject as institutions that allow to materialize the integral reparation of the second vulnerable occupants in Colombia.
format
Article
author
Rueda Lázaro, Jesús Manuel
López Niño, Giovanni Enrique
Casadiegos Santana, Martín Humberto
author_facet
Rueda Lázaro, Jesús Manuel
López Niño, Giovanni Enrique
Casadiegos Santana, Martín Humberto
author_sort
Rueda Lázaro, Jesús Manuel
title
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
title_short
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
title_full
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
title_fullStr
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
title_full_unstemmed
La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en Colombia
title_sort
la reparación integral de los segundos ocupantes vulnerables en colombia
publishDate
2022
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8702318
_version_
1752420953397133312
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015630242022-12-15La Reparación Integral de los Segundos Ocupantes Vulnerables en ColombiaRueda Lázaro, Jesús ManuelLópez Niño, Giovanni EnriqueCasadiegos Santana, Martín HumbertoInmutabilidad de la sentencia restitutivaInstituciones jurídico-procesalesReparación integralRestitución de tierrasSegundo ocupanteImmutability of the restitutive sentenceProcedural legal institutionsholistic reparationLand restitutionSecond occupantOn June 10, 2011 the execution of the Victims Law was launched, with the purpose of attending, assisting, and repairing the victims of the internal armed conflict. The implementation of the law and the constitutional precedent established in Judgment C-330 of 2016, certain situations or conditions that were not foreseen by the legislator became evident, especially, the ignorance of a heterogeneous group known as second occupants and the omission of post-judgment institutions for its recognition and comprehensive reparation. This problem academically motivated the beginning of a research process, based on the question, ¿how to materialize the integral reparation of the second occupants, unknown by judicial sentence, prior to the constitutional precedent C-330 of 2016 by the land judge? To answer this question, the procedural laws and the extended jurisdiction of land restitution judges must be considered, as well as the fact that sentences are immutable and irrevocable. The research problem is answered by applying legal hermeneutics, from its formal idealistic philosophical current, through the systematic method and the technique of integration by induction to analyze the applicability of the extraordinary appeal for review, the constitutional mechanism of protection, the modulation of constitutional sentences and the addition of sentences of the General Code of the Process, which allows us to suggest some aspects to make the institutions more flexible, taking into account the differential approach of the law and the quality of the benefactor subject as institutions that allow to materialize the integral reparation of the second vulnerable occupants in Colombia.El 10 de junio del año 2011 se puso en marcha la ejecución de la Ley de Víctimas, con la finalidad de atender, asistir y reparar a las víctimas del conflicto armado interno. La puesta en práctica de la ley y el precedente constitucional establecido en la Sentencia C-330 de 2016 hicieron evidentes ciertas situaciones o condiciones que no fueron previstas por el legislador, en especial, el desconocimiento de un grupo heterogéneo conocido como segundos ocupantes y la omisión de instituciones posfallo para su reconocimiento y reparación integral. Este problema motivó académicamente el inicio de un proceso de investigación, con base en la pregunta ¿cómo materializar la reparación integral de los segundos ocupantes, desconocidos por sentencia judicial, con anterioridad al precedente constitucional C-330 de 2016 por el juez de tierras? Para responder a este interrogante se debe tener en cuenta las leyes procesales y la competencia extendida de los jueces de restitución de tierras, así como el hecho de que las sentencias son inmutables e irrevocables. El problema de investigación se responde aplicando la hermenéutica jurídica, desde su corriente filosófica idealista formal, a través del método sistemático y de la técnica de integración por inducción para analizar la aplicabilidad del recurso extraordinario de revisión, el mecanismo constitucional de tutela, la modulación de sentencias constitucionales y la adición de sentencias del Código General del Proceso (2012), lo que permite sugerir algunos aspectos a flexibilizar en las instituciones, teniendo en cuenta el enfoque diferencial de la ley y la calidad del sujeto benefactor como instituciones que permiten materializar la reparación integral de los segundos ocupantes vulnerables en Colombia.  2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8702318(Revista) ISSN 2215-8944(Revista) ISSN 2539-4983Academia & Derecho, ISSN 2539-4983, null 13, Nº. 24, 2022spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI