Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?

On August 26, 2018, the Popular Anticorruption Consultation was held in Colombia. It did not have direct legal effects as it did not reach the required minimum participation, but the indirect effects and the characteristics of the consultation deserve study and reflection. The promoters defended tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramírez Nárdiz, Alfredo
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416123
Source:Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 165-202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001527685
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015276852022-05-04Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?Ramírez Nárdiz, AlfredoConsulta populardemocracia participativapopulismocorrupciónColombiaPopular consultationparticipatory democracypopulismcorruptionColombiaOn August 26, 2018, the Popular Anticorruption Consultation was held in Colombia. It did not have direct legal effects as it did not reach the required minimum participation, but the indirect effects and the characteristics of the consultation deserve study and reflection. The promoters defended that it contributed to make corruption visible as a capital problem of Colombian society. The detractors considered it a resource for personal political promotion of the former. It is worth asking if the consultation was a participatory instrument that improved the Colombian political life or if it was a perversion of participatory democracy that it worsened. This text sets out the regulation and practice of popular consultation in Colombia, analyzes the 2018 consultation, develops a series of proposed elements of what good participatory democracy is and what is not and, from them, studies the nature of the consultation. It is concluded that the consultation had positive aspects, but it was not a good participatory practice.El 26 de agosto de 2018 se celebró en Colombia la Consulta Popular Anticorrupción. No tuvo efectos jurídicos directos al no alcanzar la participación mínima exigida, pero los efectos indirectos y las características de la consulta merecen estudio y reflexión. Los promotores defendieron que contribuyó a visibilizar la corrupción como un problema capital de la sociedad colombiana. Los detractores la consideraron un recurso de promoción política personal de los primeros. Cabe preguntarse si la consulta fue un instrumento participativo que mejoró la vida política colombiana o una perversión de la democracia participativa que la empeoró. Este texto expone la regulación y práctica de la consulta popular en Colombia, analiza la consulta de 2018, desarrolla una serie de elementos que se proponen para determinar qué es y qué no es buena democracia participativa y, desde ellos, estudia la naturaleza de la consulta. Se concluye que la consulta tuvo aspectos positivos, pero no fue una buena práctica participativa.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416123(Revista) ISSN 0211-5743Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 165-202spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 165-202
language
Spanish
topic
Consulta popular
democracia participativa
populismo
corrupción
Colombia
Popular consultation
participatory democracy
populism
corruption
Colombia
spellingShingle
Consulta popular
democracia participativa
populismo
corrupción
Colombia
Popular consultation
participatory democracy
populism
corruption
Colombia
Ramírez Nárdiz, Alfredo
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
description
On August 26, 2018, the Popular Anticorruption Consultation was held in Colombia. It did not have direct legal effects as it did not reach the required minimum participation, but the indirect effects and the characteristics of the consultation deserve study and reflection. The promoters defended that it contributed to make corruption visible as a capital problem of Colombian society. The detractors considered it a resource for personal political promotion of the former. It is worth asking if the consultation was a participatory instrument that improved the Colombian political life or if it was a perversion of participatory democracy that it worsened. This text sets out the regulation and practice of popular consultation in Colombia, analyzes the 2018 consultation, develops a series of proposed elements of what good participatory democracy is and what is not and, from them, studies the nature of the consultation. It is concluded that the consultation had positive aspects, but it was not a good participatory practice.
format
Article
author
Ramírez Nárdiz, Alfredo
author_facet
Ramírez Nárdiz, Alfredo
author_sort
Ramírez Nárdiz, Alfredo
title
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
title_short
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
title_full
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
title_fullStr
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
title_full_unstemmed
Consulta anticorrupción de Colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
title_sort
consulta anticorrupción de colombia de 2018: ¿buena o mala democracia participativa?
publishDate
2022
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416123
_version_
1732017760015220736