Aplicación de la unidad de medida y actualización en las pensiones en México: Comentarios a la Jurisprudencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación: contradicción de tesis 200/2020

This paper examines the case law ruling issued by the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) contradicting Opinion 200/2020, which concerns an economic-political criteria to allegedly protect the finances of the ISSSTE, in this case, to the detriment of pensioners and supports the reform of Decembe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morales Ramírez, María Ascensión
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8384450
Source:Revista de Estudios Jurídico Laborales y de Seguridad Social (REJLSS), ISSN 2660-437X, Nº. 4, 2022, pags. 300-319
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This paper examines the case law ruling issued by the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) contradicting Opinion 200/2020, which concerns an economic-political criteria to allegedly protect the finances of the ISSSTE, in this case, to the detriment of pensioners and supports the reform of December 16, 2020, on Social Security Law pensions, which legalized the UMA. In this way, it diverged from the prevailing trend of the rulings and case law adopted since 2018 by various Collegiate Circuit Courts of the Federal Judiciary on labor and administrative issues in favor of pensioners, concerning the use of the general minimum wage in calculating retirement pensions.