Lucha política en Twitter del ciberespacio. Partidos políticos en Perú (2019-2020)

The objective of this work was to know the way in which the political struggle developed in the cyberspace social network Twitter in the period June 2019 - June 2020, determining the level of adherence of the population, effectiveness in the achievement of new followers, level of informative product...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aliaga Lodtmann, Cluber Fernando
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2021
Subjects:
cyber politics
social networks
internet
Twitter
comunicación política
ciberpolítica
redes sociales
comunicação política
redes sociais
political communication
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8086919
Source:Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 20, Nº. 42, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: July-December), pags. 485-508
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Lucha política en Twitter del ciberespacio. Partidos políticos en Perú (2019-2020)
Summary: The objective of this work was to know the way in which the political struggle developed in the cyberspace social network Twitter in the period June 2019 - June 2020, determining the level of adherence of the population, effectiveness in the achievement of new followers, level of informative production, effectiveness and type of the disseminated messages, apparent objectives, most recurrent themes, deduced alliances, and the map of conflict of the political parties. It begins with a brief review of the theory and related previous research. The results show an asymmetric, irregular and not homogeneous development of the struggle of the Peruvian political parties. The main characteristics of the political struggle in in the Peruvian cyberspace are identified through the use of the Twitter social network by 10 of the 24 political parties registered with the JNE as of June 2019. Of the 10 selected parties, four have not registered communicative activity (PAP, AP, SP and PPC); two, little activity (FP and PM); two, medium activity (PNP and FA) and two, high activity (APP and C). The PNP and FP are the most confrontational, while the majority try to avoid obvious antagonism, and one (PM) avoids criticism or comments against parties or political leaders.

Similar Items