Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
Interaction between law and religion as two modes of regulation of human behavior, is a reality that seems inevitable, despite the pretensions of mutual independence. The historical evolution of monopolistic systems (monistic or dualistic) of spiritual and temporal powers, leads to a state secu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7947640 |
Source: | Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 121-138 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001459624
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014596242021-06-08Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuosMéndez Reátegui, RubénNavalpotro Sánchez-Peinado, Jesús-Maríalibertad religiosasecularizaciónlaicidadEstado-Iglesiareligious freedomsecularizationlaicityStateChurchInteraction between law and religion as two modes of regulation of human behavior, is a reality that seems inevitable, despite the pretensions of mutual independence. The historical evolution of monopolistic systems (monistic or dualistic) of spiritual and temporal powers, leads to a state secularism, and the goal must be to respect fundamental human rights, including religious freedom, with its public repercussion. Although the state has often been unable to articulate this balance, the interaction of relevant social facts can be viable only through mutual recognition.La interacción entre derecho y religión como dos modos de regulación de la conducta humana es algo que parece inevitable, pese a las pretensiones de mutua independencia. El devenir histórico de sistemas monopolísticos (monista o dualista) de los poderes espiritual y temporal a sistemas pluralistas lleva a una laicidad estatal, y el objetivo ha de ser el respeto de los derechos fundamentales de la persona, incluso la libertad religiosa, con repercusión pública. Aunque el Estado muchas veces no ha sido capaz de articular ese equilibrio, solo en el mutuo reconocimiento es viable la interacción de hechos sociales relevantes.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7947640(Revista) ISSN 1794-2918Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 121-138spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 121-138
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
libertad religiosa
secularización laicidad Estado-Iglesia religious freedom secularization laicity StateChurch |
spellingShingle |
libertad religiosa
secularización laicidad Estado-Iglesia religious freedom secularization laicity StateChurch Méndez Reátegui, Rubén Navalpotro Sánchez-Peinado, Jesús-María Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos |
description |
Interaction between law and religion as two
modes of regulation of human behavior, is a reality
that seems inevitable, despite the pretensions of
mutual independence. The historical evolution of
monopolistic systems (monistic or dualistic) of spiritual
and temporal powers, leads to a state secularism,
and the goal must be to respect fundamental human
rights, including religious freedom, with its public
repercussion. Although the state has often been
unable to articulate this balance, the interaction
of relevant social facts can be viable only through
mutual recognition.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Méndez Reátegui, Rubén
Navalpotro Sánchez-Peinado, Jesús-María |
author_facet |
Méndez Reátegui, Rubén
Navalpotro Sánchez-Peinado, Jesús-María |
author_sort |
Méndez Reátegui, Rubén
|
title |
Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
title_short |
Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
title_full |
Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
title_fullStr |
Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
title_sort |
derecho y religión: interrelaciones entre dos ordenamientos propincuos
|
publishDate |
2021
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7947640
|
_version_ |
1709753904990781440
|