Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC

This study explores the possibility of an interpretation of Article 1186 CC in a way that would allow the creditor to claim back the proceedings that the debtor obtained by selling the thing that the latter owed to the former. When the debtor himself has made performance of the contract impossible b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Basozabal Arrue, Xabier
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7853290
Source:Anuario de derecho civil, ISSN 0210-301X, Vol. 73, Nº 4, 2020, pags. 1501-1542
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001446748
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Anuario de derecho civil, ISSN 0210-301X, Vol. 73, Nº 4, 2020, pags. 1501-1542
language
Spanish
topic
Commodum representationis (o ex re)
Commodum ex negotiatione
Imposibilidad sobrevenida
Obligación de dar cosa cierta
Doble venta
Venta de cosa debida
Condictio por intromisión
Commodum representationis (or ex re)
Commodum ex negotiatione
Supervening impossibility of performance
Obligation to give a thing
Double sale
Sale of an already sold thing
Restitution for wrongs
spellingShingle
Commodum representationis (o ex re)
Commodum ex negotiatione
Imposibilidad sobrevenida
Obligación de dar cosa cierta
Doble venta
Venta de cosa debida
Condictio por intromisión
Commodum representationis (or ex re)
Commodum ex negotiatione
Supervening impossibility of performance
Obligation to give a thing
Double sale
Sale of an already sold thing
Restitution for wrongs
Basozabal Arrue, Xabier
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
description
This study explores the possibility of an interpretation of Article 1186 CC in a way that would allow the creditor to claim back the proceedings that the debtor obtained by selling the thing that the latter owed to the former. When the debtor himself has made performance of the contract impossible by selling the thing to a second buyer, it seems clear that the first buyer may claim compensation for damages caused by the breach. But also, this second price obtained by the debtor negotiation «represents» the owed thing in the debtor’s patrimony and, therefore, the question is whether the first buyer could demand that second price from the debtor, in exchange of the price applicable to the first sale. Since Díez-Picazo expressed his position on the matter more than ten years ago, a debate has been held in our literature, but it is still unclear what can be expected from a solution like this, what function is called to fulfill such an obligation, etc. In this context, this study seeks to answer the question of whether there is an obligation to surrender the commodum ex negotiatione and, if this is the case, to which creditors should be recognized such an obligation and to what extent.
format
Article
author
Basozabal Arrue, Xabier
author_facet
Basozabal Arrue, Xabier
author_sort
Basozabal Arrue, Xabier
title
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
title_short
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
title_full
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
title_fullStr
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
title_full_unstemmed
Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CC
title_sort
incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 cc
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7853290
_version_
1709754024097480704
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014467482021-04-15Incumplir por negociar con la cosa debida: el commodum ex negotiatione en el artículo 1186 CCBasozabal Arrue, XabierCommodum representationis (o ex re)Commodum ex negotiationeImposibilidad sobrevenidaObligación de dar cosa ciertaDoble ventaVenta de cosa debidaCondictio por intromisiónCommodum representationis (or ex re)Commodum ex negotiationeSupervening impossibility of performanceObligation to give a thingDouble saleSale of an already sold thingRestitution for wrongsThis study explores the possibility of an interpretation of Article 1186 CC in a way that would allow the creditor to claim back the proceedings that the debtor obtained by selling the thing that the latter owed to the former. When the debtor himself has made performance of the contract impossible by selling the thing to a second buyer, it seems clear that the first buyer may claim compensation for damages caused by the breach. But also, this second price obtained by the debtor negotiation «represents» the owed thing in the debtor’s patrimony and, therefore, the question is whether the first buyer could demand that second price from the debtor, in exchange of the price applicable to the first sale. Since Díez-Picazo expressed his position on the matter more than ten years ago, a debate has been held in our literature, but it is still unclear what can be expected from a solution like this, what function is called to fulfill such an obligation, etc. In this context, this study seeks to answer the question of whether there is an obligation to surrender the commodum ex negotiatione and, if this is the case, to which creditors should be recognized such an obligation and to what extent.Este es un estudio sobre la posibilidad de interpretar el artículo 1186 CC de manera que el acreedor pueda exigir al deudor lo que éste ha obtenido por disponer de la cosa debida a aquél. Cuando la imposibilidad sobrevenida la causa el propio deudor de cosa cierta, por ejemplo, por venderla a un segundo comprador, parece claro que el primer comprador podrá pedirle la indemnización de los daños que le haya causado el incumplimiento. Pero además, ese segundo precio obtenido por negociación «representa» a la cosa debida en el patrimonio del deudor y la cuestión es si podría el primer comprador exigir lo que el segundo ha pagado por la cosa, a cambio del precio pactado en la primera venta. Desde que Díez-Picazo se pronunciara sobre la cuestión hace ya más de diez años se han sucedido algunas opiniones pero no está claro lo que podría aportar una solución así, qué función está llamada a cumplir una obligación tal, etc. En definitiva, este estudio procura responder a la cuestión de si existe una obligación de entregar el commodum ex negotiatione y, en tal caso, a qué acreedores debería reconocerse y con qué alcance.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7853290(Revista) ISSN 0210-301XAnuario de derecho civil, ISSN 0210-301X, Vol. 73, Nº 4, 2020, pags. 1501-1542spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI