La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
Despite the time elapsed since its creation, the CGPJ has not yet been able to fully endow itself with a stable physiognomy. The successive legislative changes, together with its traditional problems of operation, make it an organ in constant evolution, without the causes that have motivated the cri...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7367116 |
Source: | Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 40, Nº 118, 2020, pags. 13-44 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001444816
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014448162021-04-01La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulaciónCabellos Espiérrez, Miguel AngelConsejo General del Poder JudicialLey Orgánica del Poder Judicialgobierno del Poder JudicialGeneral Council of the JudiciaryOrganic Law of the JudiciaryJudiciary governmentDespite the time elapsed since its creation, the CGPJ has not yet been able to fully endow itself with a stable physiognomy. The successive legislative changes, together with its traditional problems of operation, make it an organ in constant evolution, without the causes that have motivated the criticisms that it has traditionally received have been addressed by the legislator rather than in a fragmentary way. The last chapter in its path of constant change is the reform of the LOPJ that at the end of 2018 modified a series of relevant issues related to the Council, of which the present work wants to analyze two, regarding the appointment of high judicial positions and the configuration of the structure of the Council and the dedication of its members. The reform can be assessed in a globally positive way in these aspects, but it is necessary to act on a capital problem: the way of appointing the members of judicial origin, an omission that causes the reform to be considered unfinished, as another piece in a task of organ remodeling that seems already permanent.Pese al tiempo transcurrido desde su creación, el CGPJ no ha conseguido aún dotarse plenamente de una fisonomía estable. Los sucesivos cambios legislativos, unidos a sus tradicionales problemas de funcionamiento, hacen de él un órgano en constante evolución, sin que las causas que han motivado las críticas que tradicionalmente ha recibido hayan sido abordadas por el legislador más que de modo fragmentario. El último capítulo en su camino de cambio constante lo constituye la reforma de la LOPJ que a finales de 2018 modificó una serie de cuestiones relevantes relativas al Consejo, de las que el presente trabajo quiere analizar dos, relativas al nombramiento de altos cargos judiciales y a la configuración de la estructura del Consejo y de la dedicación de sus miembros. La reforma puede ser valorada de modo globalmente positivo en estos aspectos, pero falta actuar sobre un problema capital: el modo de nombramiento de los vocales de origen judicial, omisión que hace que la reforma deba considerarse inacabada, como una pieza más en una tarea de remodelación del órgano que parece ya permanente.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7367116(Revista) ISSN 0211-5743Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 40, Nº 118, 2020, pags. 13-44spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 40, Nº 118, 2020, pags. 13-44
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
Consejo General del Poder Judicial
Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial gobierno del Poder Judicial General Council of the Judiciary Organic Law of the Judiciary Judiciary government |
spellingShingle |
Consejo General del Poder Judicial
Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial gobierno del Poder Judicial General Council of the Judiciary Organic Law of the Judiciary Judiciary government Cabellos Espiérrez, Miguel Angel La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación |
description |
Despite the time elapsed since its creation, the CGPJ has not yet been able to fully endow itself with a stable physiognomy. The successive legislative changes, together with its traditional problems of operation, make it an organ in constant evolution, without the causes that have motivated the criticisms that it has traditionally received have been addressed by the legislator rather than in a fragmentary way. The last chapter in its path of constant change is the reform of the LOPJ that at the end of 2018 modified a series of relevant issues related to the Council, of which the present work wants to analyze two, regarding the appointment of high judicial positions and the configuration of the structure of the Council and the dedication of its members. The reform can be assessed in a globally positive way in these aspects, but it is necessary to act on a capital problem: the way of appointing the members of judicial origin, an omission that causes the reform to be considered unfinished, as another piece in a task of organ remodeling that seems already permanent.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Cabellos Espiérrez, Miguel Angel
|
author_facet |
Cabellos Espiérrez, Miguel Angel
|
author_sort |
Cabellos Espiérrez, Miguel Angel
|
title |
La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
title_short |
La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
title_full |
La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
title_fullStr |
La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
title_full_unstemmed |
La reforma inacabada: el Consejo General del Poder Judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
title_sort |
la reforma inacabada: el consejo general del poder judicial ante su enésima reformulación
|
publishDate |
2020
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7367116
|
_version_ |
1709754294077489152
|