Las razones de Andrés Bello para derogar de la legislación chilena la institución de la Restitutio in Integrum proveniente del derecho indiano
The object of the present paper is to explain the fundamental reasons on which Andres Bello based his decision to exclude and derogate the legal institution of restitutio in integrum, derived ultimately from the Derecho Indiano (Spanish colonial law on the status of Indians), when drafting the Chile...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7536685 |
| Fuente: | Revista chilena de derecho y ciencia política, ISSN 0718-9389, Vol. 11, Nº. 1, 2020, pags. 250-280 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
The object of the present paper is to explain the fundamental reasons on which Andres Bello based his decision to exclude and derogate the legal institution of restitutio in integrum, derived ultimately from the Derecho Indiano (Spanish colonial law on the status of Indians), when drafting the Chilean Civil Code of 1857. It will also analyze the meaning and implications of the “Law on retroactive effect”, enacted in 1861. In what seems a contradiction, Article 11 of this law makes explicit reference to the restitutio in integrum, prohibiting its exercise only four years after it had already been derogated by the Civil Code. |
|---|