Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
This article will study the most significant issues that arise in the hearing of accusation, such as those that arise from the addition of new facts that were not they coiled by the prosecution in the indictment hearing. This is a violation of the defendant’s right of the accused because he is being...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7485877 |
| Source: | Revista Juridica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 11, Nº. 21, 2019, pags. 19-28 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001397096
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013970962020-07-08Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusaciónSalgado Gonzalez, AlvaroCortina, Andres Pauloacusaciónimputaciónnulidadhechos jurídicamente relevantesdefensaAccusationimputationnullitylegally relevant factsdefenseThis article will study the most significant issues that arise in the hearing of accusation, such as those that arise from the addition of new facts that were not they coiled by the prosecution in the indictment hearing. This is a violation of the defendant’s right of the accused because he is being surprised with facts that he did not have the opportunity to defend himself. Thus, we’ll propose a possible solution to validate such a situation without the end of reaching a nullity. It will also analyze the most common mistakes made by prosecutors when capturing legally relevant facts, which is the factual hypothesis that frames the criminal category. On the other hand, we’ll analyze the normative gap that our criminal procedure statute has respect to the withdrawal of the indictment and finally we will explain why it is not possible to request the nullity of the indictment.Este artículo estudiará las problemáticas más significativas que se suscitan en la audiencia de acusación, como aquellas que surgen al adicionar hechos nuevos que no fueron enrostrados por la fiscalía en la audiencia de imputación de cargos. Ello constituye una violación al derecho de defensa del imputado porque se le está sorprendiendo con hechos de los cuales no tuvo la oportunidad de defenderse. Así, plantearemos una posible solución para convalidar tal situación sin el extremo de llegar a una nulidad. También se analizarán los errores más comunes en los que incurren los fiscales a la hora de plasmar los hechos jurídicamente relevantes, lo que es la hipótesis fáctica que encuadra el tipo penal. Por otra parte, se analizará el vacío normativo que tiene nuestro estatuto procesal penal respecto al retiro del escrito de acusación y finalmente se explicará por qué no es susceptible pedirse la nulidad del escrito de acusación.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7485877(Revista) ISSN 2145-6054(Revista) ISSN 2256-2796Revista Juridica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 11, Nº. 21, 2019, pags. 19-28spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Juridica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 11, Nº. 21, 2019, pags. 19-28
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
acusación
imputación nulidad hechos jurídicamente relevantes defensa Accusation imputation nullity legally relevant facts defense |
| spellingShingle |
acusación
imputación nulidad hechos jurídicamente relevantes defensa Accusation imputation nullity legally relevant facts defense Salgado Gonzalez, Alvaro Cortina, Andres Paulo Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación |
| description |
This article will study the most significant issues that arise in the hearing of accusation, such as those that arise from the addition of new facts that were not they coiled by the prosecution in the indictment hearing. This is a violation of the defendant’s right of the accused because he is being surprised with facts that he did not have the opportunity to defend himself. Thus, we’ll propose a possible solution to validate such a situation without the end of reaching a nullity. It will also analyze the most common mistakes made by prosecutors when capturing legally relevant facts, which is the factual hypothesis that frames the criminal category. On the other hand, we’ll analyze the normative gap that our criminal procedure statute has respect to the withdrawal of the indictment and finally we will explain why it is not possible to request the nullity of the indictment.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Salgado Gonzalez, Alvaro
Cortina, Andres Paulo |
| author_facet |
Salgado Gonzalez, Alvaro
Cortina, Andres Paulo |
| author_sort |
Salgado Gonzalez, Alvaro
|
| title |
Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| title_short |
Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| title_full |
Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| title_fullStr |
Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| title_sort |
aspectos controversiales de la audiencia de acusación
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7485877
|
| _version_ |
1709752630068117504
|