La fundamentación y la motivación como habilitantes de la prisión preventiva
The objective was to analyze the right to freedom and the presumption of innocence so as to allow the rationalization of the use of this criminal precautionary mechanism requested by the prosecution and authorized by the judges of criminal guarantees, with emphasis on the Right to physical freedom a...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2020
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7408539 |
| Baliabidea: | Iustitia Socialis: Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, ISSN 2542-3371, Vol. 5, Nº. 8, 2020, pags. 465-492 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The objective was to analyze the right to freedom and the presumption of innocence so as to allow the rationalization of the use of this criminal precautionary mechanism requested by the prosecution and authorized by the judges of criminal guarantees, with emphasis on the Right to physical freedom and presumption of the constitutional state of innocence. Scientific research methods are based on the qualitative model, underpinned by techniques such as analysis and bibliographic synthesis, in the same historical way and deductive inductive logic. From the foregoing it is concluded that despite the national and international normative, doctrinal and jurisprudential progress in this matter, there is still an imbalance in its use, which entails legal consequences that violate essential rights such as physical freedom and the constitutional state of innocence. |
|---|