El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea

This article emerges from the idea that is not easy to determine the border between plagiarism and original creation. In principle, the plagiarism is an appropriation of the effort of others. The question, however, is whether it is always a fraud or sometimes it is inevitable of committing: the insp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: López Fernández, Elba
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7351385
Source:Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas: RICSH, ISSN 2395-7972, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 330-350
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001377041
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas: RICSH, ISSN 2395-7972, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 330-350
language
Spanish
topic
derechos de autor
estilo
imitación
originalidad
técnica
copyright
style
imitation
originality
technique
direitos autorais
estilo
imitação
originalidade
técnica
spellingShingle
derechos de autor
estilo
imitación
originalidad
técnica
copyright
style
imitation
originality
technique
direitos autorais
estilo
imitação
originalidade
técnica
López Fernández, Elba
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
description
This article emerges from the idea that is not easy to determine the border between plagiarism and original creation. In principle, the plagiarism is an appropriation of the effort of others. The question, however, is whether it is always a fraud or sometimes it is inevitable of committing: the inspiration or reciprocal influence between two works break into the discussion. How to know what can or cannot be done, where is the line between the legitimate and the illegitimate? The objective here it was to determine the scope and limits of the figure of plagiarism. For this, certain linguistic ambiguities implicit in its definition were analyzed. The sources consulted helped to determine that, although the laws argue that the ideas themselves are not protectable, for practical purposes this reality is not so clear. The methodology used was descriptive; as an instrument was resorted to documentary research. As a result, it could be established, through the analysis of lookalikes, that ideas can be protected even in their abstract sense, namely, the primary ideas that are in the mind and not only in the form that it has adopted when expressing itself, since the idea is defined by its expression, the same idea can be expressed in different ways. It is concluded that, in reality, the absolute lack of protection of ideas is not an axiom, despite the latter constitutes one of the doctrinal principles of copyright, since the idea to be materialized and shared is linked to a mode of expression and indirectly protected by this. Intellectual property, in principle, does not protect artistic or creative techniques neither styles nor themes; but the protection of the work, although it tries to exclude what is exposed, namely: the idea, the method, the style and the technique, cannot always do it, incurring a contradiction that forgets that the creation is partly imitation.
format
Article
author
López Fernández, Elba
author_facet
López Fernández, Elba
author_sort
López Fernández, Elba
title
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
title_short
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
title_full
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
title_fullStr
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
title_full_unstemmed
El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
title_sort
el plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la idea
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7351385
_version_
1709751616305889280
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013770412020-04-28El plagio: la dicotomía entre la idea y la expresión de la ideaLópez Fernández, Elbaderechos de autorestiloimitaciónoriginalidadtécnicacopyrightstyleimitationoriginalitytechniquedireitos autoraisestiloimitaçãooriginalidadetécnicaThis article emerges from the idea that is not easy to determine the border between plagiarism and original creation. In principle, the plagiarism is an appropriation of the effort of others. The question, however, is whether it is always a fraud or sometimes it is inevitable of committing: the inspiration or reciprocal influence between two works break into the discussion. How to know what can or cannot be done, where is the line between the legitimate and the illegitimate? The objective here it was to determine the scope and limits of the figure of plagiarism. For this, certain linguistic ambiguities implicit in its definition were analyzed. The sources consulted helped to determine that, although the laws argue that the ideas themselves are not protectable, for practical purposes this reality is not so clear. The methodology used was descriptive; as an instrument was resorted to documentary research. As a result, it could be established, through the analysis of lookalikes, that ideas can be protected even in their abstract sense, namely, the primary ideas that are in the mind and not only in the form that it has adopted when expressing itself, since the idea is defined by its expression, the same idea can be expressed in different ways. It is concluded that, in reality, the absolute lack of protection of ideas is not an axiom, despite the latter constitutes one of the doctrinal principles of copyright, since the idea to be materialized and shared is linked to a mode of expression and indirectly protected by this. Intellectual property, in principle, does not protect artistic or creative techniques neither styles nor themes; but the protection of the work, although it tries to exclude what is exposed, namely: the idea, the method, the style and the technique, cannot always do it, incurring a contradiction that forgets that the creation is partly imitation.Este artículo surge a partir de la idea de que no resulta fácil determinar la frontera entre plagio y creación original. En principio, el plagio trata de una apropiación del esfuerzo ajeno. La cuestión es, sin embargo, si siempre se está ante un fraude o si a veces es un acto inevitable de cometer: la inspiración o la influencia recíproca entre dos obras irrumpen en la discusión. ¿Cómo saber qué es lo que se puede o no se puede hacer y dónde está el límite entre lo legítimo y lo ilegítimo? El objetivo aquí fue determinar el alcance y los límites de la figura del plagio. Y para ello se analizaron ciertas ambigüedades lingüísticas implícitas en su definición. Las fuentes consultadas ayudaron a determinar que, a pesar de que las leyes argumentan que las ideas en sí mismas no son protegibles, a efectos prácticos esta realidad no está tan clara. La metodología usada en este artículo fue descriptiva. Como instrumento se recurrió a la investigación documental. Entres los resultados se pudo establecer, a través del análisis de lookalikes, que las ideas pueden estar protegidas incluso en su sentido abstracto, ya que aunque queden definidas por su expresión pueden ser expresadas de formas diferentes. Se concluye que en realidad la desprotección absoluta de las ideas no es un axioma, a pesar de que este último constituye uno de los principios doctrinales del derecho de autor, ya que la idea, al ser materializada y compartida, queda ligada a un modo de expresión e indirectamente protegida por este. La propiedad intelectual, en principio, tampoco protege las técnicas artísticas o creativas ni los estilos ni los temas; pero la protección de la obra, aunque trate de excluir lo que se expone, esto es: la idea, el método, el estilo y la técnica, no siempre puede hacerlo, incurriendo en una contradicción que olvida que la creación es en parte imitación.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7351385(Revista) ISSN 2395-7972Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas: RICSH, ISSN 2395-7972, Vol. 9, Nº. 17, 2020, pags. 330-350spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI