Aproximación a la categoría del «cuasidelito» del Código de Andrés Bello a partir de las obligationes quasi ex delicto del derecho romano clásico

The Civil Code of Andrés Bello, influenced by the French Civil Code, and unlike other European and Latin American codes, included the category of quasi-delict as a source of obligations. However, this notion hasbeen difficult to understand, and has been often branded as merely formal, difficult to d...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Sánchez Hernández, Luis Carlos
Formatua: Artikulua
Hizkuntza:Gaztelania
Argitaratua: 2019
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7226149
Baliabidea:Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 2305-2546, Nº. 83, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevas tecnologías: El futuro del Derecho en la era digital), pags. 265-302
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
Laburpena: The Civil Code of Andrés Bello, influenced by the French Civil Code, and unlike other European and Latin American codes, included the category of quasi-delict as a source of obligations. However, this notion hasbeen difficult to understand, and has been often branded as merely formal, difficult to define and devoid of any practical utility. For this reason, this paper proposes an analysis of the category of «quasi-delicts» on the basis of the socalled obligations quasi ex delicto in classical Roman law. Such obligations were very useful for the formulation of a perfect and comprehensive division of the sources of obligations. After studying the reception of the quasi-delict in Andres Bello’s Code, both in Chile and in Colombia, this paper proposes some ideas that could contribute to a new understanding of the category and, with it, to the renewal of its systematic and practical utility. The aim of this paper is to highlight the most important aspects of this category that allow for a re-reading of the modern category of quasi-delict in the light of classical Roman categories. For this reason, it would exceed the scope of the present work to carry out an exhaustive exegetical analysis of the entire collection of Roman sources that refer to this matter.