El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito

This article aims to approach the dilemma posed excluding (or not) the privilege of desistance in cases of failed attempt, with the possibility of still performing a criminal offence. For this, synthetic analytical research method was used. The structure of the article, after the introduction, begin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Betancourt Rodríguez, Santiago
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2019
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7190625
Source:Ius Humani: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1390-440X, Nº. 8, 2019, pags. 187-223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001358889
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013588892020-01-28El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delitoBetancourt Rodríguez, SantiagoThis article aims to approach the dilemma posed excluding (or not) the privilege of desistance in cases of failed attempt, with the possibility of still performing a criminal offence. For this, synthetic analytical research method was used. The structure of the article, after the introduction, begins first of all, this study shows general issues about the attempt, and doctrinal arguments to justify its punitiveness. Secondly, it describes the desistance and its nature opposite to the attempting to commit the offence and the doctrinal positions that have justified the (non) punitiveness and benevolence of it. Finally, the article states the conflict in cases of failed attempt, with the possibility of still performing the criminal offence, the doctrine proposes, the jurisprudential rules, and the author proposes his own solution system, applying circumstances that modify the criminal responsibility.El siguiente artículo tiene como objetivo abordar el dilema que supone la exclusión (o no) del privilegio del desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito, existiendo la posibilidad de realizar aún el tipo y proponer una solución. Para ello se utilizó el método de investigación analítico sintético. La estructura del artículo, luego de la introducción, inicia con el tratamiento de cuestiones generales sobre la tentativa, y los argumentos que la doctrina utiliza para justificar la punibilidad de la tentativa. En la segunda parte, se trata el desistimiento y su naturaleza contraria a la tentativa y las posiciones doctrinales que han justificado la (no) punibilidad del desistimiento. Finalmente, se plantea el conflicto existente en los supuestos de tentativa inacabada-fracasada impropia, las soluciones doctrinales planteadas, y los criterios jurisprudenciales; concluyendo así, que no resultan suficientes, por lo que se propone un sistema propio de solución al conflicto con la aplicación de un sistema de circunstancias modificatorias en la responsabilidad penal.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7190625(Revista) ISSN 1390-7794(Revista) ISSN 1390-440XIus Humani: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1390-440X, Nº. 8, 2019, pags. 187-223spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Ius Humani: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1390-440X, Nº. 8, 2019, pags. 187-223
language
Spanish
description
This article aims to approach the dilemma posed excluding (or not) the privilege of desistance in cases of failed attempt, with the possibility of still performing a criminal offence. For this, synthetic analytical research method was used. The structure of the article, after the introduction, begins first of all, this study shows general issues about the attempt, and doctrinal arguments to justify its punitiveness. Secondly, it describes the desistance and its nature opposite to the attempting to commit the offence and the doctrinal positions that have justified the (non) punitiveness and benevolence of it. Finally, the article states the conflict in cases of failed attempt, with the possibility of still performing the criminal offence, the doctrine proposes, the jurisprudential rules, and the author proposes his own solution system, applying circumstances that modify the criminal responsibility.
format
Article
author
Betancourt Rodríguez, Santiago
spellingShingle
Betancourt Rodríguez, Santiago
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
author_facet
Betancourt Rodríguez, Santiago
author_sort
Betancourt Rodríguez, Santiago
title
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
title_short
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
title_full
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
title_fullStr
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
title_full_unstemmed
El desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
title_sort
el desistimiento en la tentativa fracasada del delito
publishDate
2019
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7190625
_version_
1709751447799726080