Between Individual Decisions and Collegiate Deliberations: deciding how to decide, influencing the outcome

How does the institutional design of the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) interfere in the decision-making process of the conflicts that are submitted to it? STF’s Justices, as individually responsible of each proceeding in progress, can strategically decide through available procedural resources what...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gomes Neto, José Mário Wanderley, Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago, Moura de Oliveira, Tassiana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Law
State and Society
Brazilian Supreme Court
Judicialization of Politics
Judicial Behavior
Strategic Model
Direito
Estado e Sociedade
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Judicialização da Política
Comportamento Judicial
Modelo Estratégico
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7020178
Source:Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 40, Nº. 81, 2019, pags. 10-31
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Between Individual Decisions and Collegiate Deliberations: deciding how to decide, influencing the outcome
Be the first to leave a comment
You must be logged in first

Similar Items