El Estado regulador. Implicancias para el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa
The regulatory State. Implications for the judicial control of administrative discretionO Estado regulador. Implicações para o controle judicial da discricionariedade administrativaThe objective of this paper is to rethink the criteria on which the judicial control of administrative discretion is cu...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2019
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6902137 |
| Baliabidea: | Díkaion: revista de actualidad jurídica, ISSN 0120-8942, Vol. 28, Nº. 1, 2019, pags. 69-89 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The regulatory State. Implications for the judicial control of administrative discretionO Estado regulador. Implicações para o controle judicial da discricionariedade administrativaThe objective of this paper is to rethink the criteria on which the judicial control of administrative discretion is currently based. Currently, court decisions limit the margin of discretion or free choice towards administrative authorities in unforeseen situations. Therefore, in this article we propose to show the need of a new paradigm in the judicial control of the Public Administration that, at the same time, collect, orient and regulate the rules of the economy in search of the fullest satisfaction of the common good; this, given the model of Welfare State currently in force. To doing so, the Administrative Law, together with the Judicial Power, are constituted as two essential legal tools that, more than confrontation or tension, as we have seen until today, require coordination and self-restriction.Para citar este artículo / To reference this article / Para citar este artigoMariano Carbajales. “El Estado regulador. Implicancias para el control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa”, en Dikaion, 28, 1 (2019). 69-89. DOI: 10.5294/dika.2019.28.1.3.Recibido: 01/08/2018Aceptado: 13/09/2018 |
|---|