Corrección y facticidad: Justicia y democracia
This article intends a description of the Robert Alexy´s theory of correction and especial case, and which responses are possible to give to one of the most prestigious critics risen against it, which is that Jürgen Habbermas develops in his Between Facts and Norms opera. For this, shall be explaine...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2018
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6680102 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 18, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 139-164 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
This article intends a description of the Robert Alexy´s theory of correction and especial case, and which responses are possible to give to one of the most prestigious critics risen against it, which is that Jürgen Habbermas develops in his Between Facts and Norms opera. For this, shall be explained the essential matters in order to understand the concept of law which comes from this theory, and the most important arguments to demonstrate it. Below, will be shown the methodological iuspositivism main thesis, in order to present the fundamental critics developed by Habbermas to the alexian thesis of especial case, and the connection between law and justice. Finally, answers to that critics shall be proposed. |
|---|