La implementación del proceso penal acusatorio en Guerrero, México
The international pressures of the Mérida Plan (1990), the Washington Consensus (1994) and the Judgments of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2009) criticized the inefficiency, collusion of authorities and responsibility of the Mexican State for being omitted in the face of acts of indi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6565192 |
| Source: | Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas: RICSH, ISSN 2395-7972, Vol. 7, Nº. 13 (Enero - Junio 2018), 2018, pags. 108-124 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The international pressures of the Mérida Plan (1990), the Washington Consensus (1994) and the Judgments of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2009) criticized the inefficiency, collusion of authorities and responsibility of the Mexican State for being omitted in the face of acts of individuals or authorities, which affected human rights and dignity of the people, mainly in matters of application of criminal justice, and which forced the Mexican State to change its criminal procedure system.
It is considered that the change towards a more guarantee criminal justice was postponed for a long time due to the authoritarian characteristic of our political regime. The police abuses, corruption and inefficiency of our criminal justice administration and administration institutions are nothing new and these undesirable practices must end; but violence and insecurity will not be overcome only by changing procedural systems of justice. |
|---|