Cuestiones jurisprudenciales sobre la negociación colectiva
More than five years after labor reform, prompted by RDL 3/2012, subsequently validated by Law 3/2012 and deepened by RDL 11/2013, it seems appropriate to carry out a balance sheet on the filming of its main institutions in the jurisprudence, since it will allow us to see how the reform has rolled o...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2017
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6390071 |
| Baliabidea: | Temas laborales: Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, ISSN 0213-0750, Nº 139, 2017, pags. 55-158 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
More than five years after labor reform, prompted by RDL 3/2012, subsequently
validated by Law 3/2012 and deepened by RDL 11/2013, it seems appropriate to carry out a
balance sheet on the filming of its main institutions in the jurisprudence, since it will allow us
to see how the reform has rolled out and, what is more important, to what extent it has reached
its objectives in this area, in which profound and conflicting changes were introduced in our
collective labor relations. Constitutional Court had to pronounce on the constitutionality of
the reforms, validating them in their own terms (STCo 109/2014, June 16 and STCo, 8/2015,
January 22). |
|---|