An investigation of the role of domestic courts in international commercial arbitration in iranian law
The fact that almost every legal system considers a specific basis for the intervention of state courts in the process of arbitration has resulted in uncertainties and criticisms regarding the independence of the so called quasi-judicial dispute settlement of arbitration as well as its effectiveness...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6502040 |
| Fuente: | Lex Humana, ISSN 2175-0947, Vol. 9, Nº. 2 (JUL.-DEZ.), 2017, pags. 20-39 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
The fact that almost every legal system considers a specific basis for the intervention of state courts in the process of arbitration has resulted in uncertainties and criticisms regarding the independence of the so called quasi-judicial dispute settlement of arbitration as well as its effectiveness and successfulness. The author of the present study has made an effort to on the one hand separate the cases of assistive intervention of civil courts in the process of arbitration from the regulatory intervention cases and on the other hand, investigate the form-related and essential limitations of the enforcement of judicial supervision by the courts. |
|---|