El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
Historical writing on politics has maintained Franco’s political doctrine avoided thinking about the Constitution and its dogma because the regime had not a definitive constitution. If we studied the works about Franco politics we wouldn’t think that the constitution theme or even the use of the wor...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6437770 |
| Source: | Revista de estudios políticos, ISSN 0048-7694, Nº 155, 2012, pags. 207-235 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001267739
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de estudios políticos, ISSN 0048-7694, Nº 155, 2012, pags. 207-235
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Constitución
poder constituyente decisionismo ley fundamental doctrina política Constitution constituent power decisionism main law politics |
| spellingShingle |
Constitución
poder constituyente decisionismo ley fundamental doctrina política Constitution constituent power decisionism main law politics González Prieto, Luis Aurelio El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45) |
| description |
Historical writing on politics has maintained Franco’s political doctrine avoided thinking about the Constitution and its dogma because the regime had not a definitive constitution. If we studied the works about Franco politics we wouldn’t think that the constitution theme or even the use of the word constitution was rejected. Franco’s political doctrine recognizes that the regime was contrary to the constitutional system that the Republic recognizes, but everybody recognizes in Franco the power to create a system that arises from the Civil War. Franco’s political doctrine, influenced by the Falangist ideas, take on Carl Scmitt’s theories to justify Franco taking constitutional power, whereas the traditional positions thought that the regime was settled on a Constitution that was social, intern, material or historical. To overcome that ambivalence, some theories would emerge. For instance, Sánchez Agesta’s theory that defends Constitution based on organization from institutional postulates. As for Franco Constitution, it recognizes that most of the doctrine that adapts to its characteristics is the one of an open system of mainly organic separate laws, instead of a single code although there were different opinions that maintained that there was a closed Franco constitutional code.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
González Prieto, Luis Aurelio
|
| author_facet |
González Prieto, Luis Aurelio
|
| author_sort |
González Prieto, Luis Aurelio
|
| title |
El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| title_short |
El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| title_full |
El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| title_fullStr |
El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| title_sort |
el debate sobre la constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)
|
| publishDate |
2012
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6437770
|
| _version_ |
1709747449342459904
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012677392018-06-02El debate sobre la Constitución en el primer franquismo (1939-45)González Prieto, Luis AurelioConstituciónpoder constituyentedecisionismoley fundamentaldoctrina políticaConstitutionconstituent powerdecisionismmain lawpoliticsHistorical writing on politics has maintained Franco’s political doctrine avoided thinking about the Constitution and its dogma because the regime had not a definitive constitution. If we studied the works about Franco politics we wouldn’t think that the constitution theme or even the use of the word constitution was rejected. Franco’s political doctrine recognizes that the regime was contrary to the constitutional system that the Republic recognizes, but everybody recognizes in Franco the power to create a system that arises from the Civil War. Franco’s political doctrine, influenced by the Falangist ideas, take on Carl Scmitt’s theories to justify Franco taking constitutional power, whereas the traditional positions thought that the regime was settled on a Constitution that was social, intern, material or historical. To overcome that ambivalence, some theories would emerge. For instance, Sánchez Agesta’s theory that defends Constitution based on organization from institutional postulates. As for Franco Constitution, it recognizes that most of the doctrine that adapts to its characteristics is the one of an open system of mainly organic separate laws, instead of a single code although there were different opinions that maintained that there was a closed Franco constitutional code.La historiografía política viene manteniendo que la doctrina política franquista obvió los estudios sobre la constitución y su dogmática, como consecuencia de la ausencia en el régimen de una constitución normativa cerrada. Partiendo de un estudio detallado de los trabajos de la doctrina política franquista no se puede inferir que se rechazase la temática constitucional o la propia utilización del vocablo constitución. La doctrina política franquista reconoce que el régimen surge frontalmente opuesto al sistema constitucional que representa la República, pero todos reconocen en la figura de Franco el poder constituyente surgido del propio evento revolucionario que supuso la guerra civil. En su mayoría, la doctrina política franquista, influida por las ideas falangistas, asumen las teorías decisionistas de Carl Schmitt para justificar la asunción por Franco del poder constituyente, mientras que desde las posiciones tradicionalistas se inclinaban por defender que el régimen se asentaba en una constitución social, interna, material o histórica. Para superar esta ambivalencia de posturas, surgirán teorías como la encabezada por Sánchez Agesta que defenderá desde postulados institucionalistas la constitución como organización. En cuanto a la constitución franquista, reconoce la mayoría de la doctrina que la que mejor se adapta a sus características es la de un sistema abierto de leyes sueltas fundamentalmente orgánicas, en lugar de un código único, aunque no faltaron voces discordantes defensoras de un código constitucional franquista cerrado.2012text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6437770(Revista) ISSN 0048-7694Revista de estudios políticos, ISSN 0048-7694, Nº 155, 2012, pags. 207-235spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|