Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas

This bibliographic Revision Article is presented as exhaustive exploration the so-called legal pluralism. From a philosophical perspective establishes the conceptual and logical consequences can have this theory to guide the interpretive practices of law. For this, and as a strategy, it is clarified...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rengifo Castañeda, Carlos Adolfo, Wong, Eduard Mauricio, Gregorio Posada, Jorge
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657608
Source:Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2013, pags. 27-40
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001035962
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010359622016-10-08Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicasRengifo Castañeda, Carlos AdolfoWong, Eduard MauricioGregorio Posada, JorgeConocimientoderechoepistemologíaobjetividadpluralismo jurídicoLegal PluralismLawknowledgeepistemologyobjectivityThis bibliographic Revision Article is presented as exhaustive exploration the so-called legal pluralism. From a philosophical perspective establishes the conceptual and logical consequences can have this theory to guide the interpretive practices of law. For this, and as a strategy, it is clarified first jus-jus-naturalism and positivism, shown their critical views with respect to certain criteria of objectivity arising from epistemology. Then we review the legal pluralism, noting that even though you can drag the criticism of jusnaturalism, and jus-positivism, commitment moderate with minimal human universals, the shielding of relativism and subjectivism.Este artículo analiza el llamado Pluralismo Jurídico. Desde una perspectiva filosófica se establecen las consecuencias lógicas y conceptuales que puede tener esta teoría para guiar las prácticas interpretativas del Derecho. Para esto, y como estrategia, se aclara primero el iusnaturalismo y el iuspositivismo, mostrado sus puntos de vista críticos, con respecto a ciertos criterios de objetividad emanados desde la epistemología. Luego se revisa al Pluralismo Jurídico, señalando que a pesar de que puede arrastrar las críticas del iusnaturalismo, y el iuspositivismo, su compromiso moderado con mínimos universales humanos, lo blinda del relativismo y subjetivismo.2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657608(Revista) ISSN 2346-0792(Revista) ISSN 1794-1598Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2013, pags. 27-40spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2013, pags. 27-40
language
Spanish
topic
Conocimiento
derecho
epistemología
objetividad
pluralismo jurídico
Legal Pluralism
Law
knowledge
epistemology
objectivity
spellingShingle
Conocimiento
derecho
epistemología
objetividad
pluralismo jurídico
Legal Pluralism
Law
knowledge
epistemology
objectivity
Rengifo Castañeda, Carlos Adolfo
Wong, Eduard Mauricio
Gregorio Posada, Jorge
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
description
This bibliographic Revision Article is presented as exhaustive exploration the so-called legal pluralism. From a philosophical perspective establishes the conceptual and logical consequences can have this theory to guide the interpretive practices of law. For this, and as a strategy, it is clarified first jus-jus-naturalism and positivism, shown their critical views with respect to certain criteria of objectivity arising from epistemology. Then we review the legal pluralism, noting that even though you can drag the criticism of jusnaturalism, and jus-positivism, commitment moderate with minimal human universals, the shielding of relativism and subjectivism.
format
Article
author
Rengifo Castañeda, Carlos Adolfo
Wong, Eduard Mauricio
Gregorio Posada, Jorge
author_facet
Rengifo Castañeda, Carlos Adolfo
Wong, Eduard Mauricio
Gregorio Posada, Jorge
author_sort
Rengifo Castañeda, Carlos Adolfo
title
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
title_short
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
title_full
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
title_fullStr
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
title_full_unstemmed
Pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
title_sort
pluralismo jurídico: implicaciones epistemológicas
publishDate
2013
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657608
_version_
1709744615941210112