Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
In this article it is stated that a group of restrictions deserve autonomous treatment which contributes to understand Colombian accusation system, since such restrictions are in agreement to constitutional clear purpose, and in addition they may be organized into categories which facilitate their c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657599 |
| Source: | Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2014, pags. 115-125 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001035953
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2014, pags. 115-125
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Unilateral acceptation
rewarding justice pre-agreements and negotiations accusation system early termination of criminal proceedings |
| spellingShingle |
Unilateral acceptation
rewarding justice pre-agreements and negotiations accusation system early termination of criminal proceedings Rincón Angarita, Dubán Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación |
| description |
In this article it is stated that a group of restrictions deserve autonomous treatment which contributes to understand Colombian accusation system, since such restrictions are in agreement to constitutional clear purpose, and in addition they may be organized into categories which facilitate their comprehension and practical enforcement. In addition, the extent of such limitations have been defined and interpreted by resolution of the Supreme Court of justice – Criminal Court, and therefore, a review of the most important judgment on this matter contributes to proper drawing of such pluri-mentioned restrictions. Therefore, the legal problem approached in this article consist of defining the main limits to pre-agreements and acceptation of charges in the dynamics of the Colombian accusation system, organized in categories, and supported on the main resolutions of criminal jurisprudence on the matter, and likewise, discussing on justification of such limits. In summary, the article demonstrates that the group of limits to freedom of parties in exercise of methods for early termination of the criminal proceedings, is related to compliance with essential purposes of the criminal proceeding within the framework of the Political Chart, and in addition it contributes to organized, on categorized basis, actions fields which may not pass over the parties when they appeal to these means of rewarding justice
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Rincón Angarita, Dubán
|
| author_facet |
Rincón Angarita, Dubán
|
| author_sort |
Rincón Angarita, Dubán
|
| title |
Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| title_short |
Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| title_full |
Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| title_fullStr |
Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| title_sort |
preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la ley 906 de 2004: principales restricciones y su justificación
|
| publishDate |
2014
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657599
|
| _version_ |
1709744612736761856
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010359532016-10-08Preacuerdos y allanamiento unilateral en la Ley 906 de 2004: Principales restricciones y su justificaciónRincón Angarita, DubánUnilateral acceptationrewarding justicepre-agreements and negotiationsaccusation systemearly termination of criminal proceedingsIn this article it is stated that a group of restrictions deserve autonomous treatment which contributes to understand Colombian accusation system, since such restrictions are in agreement to constitutional clear purpose, and in addition they may be organized into categories which facilitate their comprehension and practical enforcement. In addition, the extent of such limitations have been defined and interpreted by resolution of the Supreme Court of justice – Criminal Court, and therefore, a review of the most important judgment on this matter contributes to proper drawing of such pluri-mentioned restrictions. Therefore, the legal problem approached in this article consist of defining the main limits to pre-agreements and acceptation of charges in the dynamics of the Colombian accusation system, organized in categories, and supported on the main resolutions of criminal jurisprudence on the matter, and likewise, discussing on justification of such limits. In summary, the article demonstrates that the group of limits to freedom of parties in exercise of methods for early termination of the criminal proceedings, is related to compliance with essential purposes of the criminal proceeding within the framework of the Political Chart, and in addition it contributes to organized, on categorized basis, actions fields which may not pass over the parties when they appeal to these means of rewarding justiceEn el presente artículo se plantea que un conjunto de restriccionesamerita un tratamiento autónomo que contribuya con elentendimiento del sistema acusatorio colombiano, puesto queatienden a claras fialidades constitucionales, y pueden ademásser conglobadas en categorías que faciliten su comprensión yaplicación práctica. Además, los alcances de estas limitacioneshan sido defiidos e interpretados por la jurisprudencia de laCorte Suprema de Justicia en su Sala Penal, y por ello, la revisiónde los fallos más relevantes sobre la materia coadyuva al correctodelineamiento de las pluricitadas restricciones.De tal forma, el problema jurídico que se va a tratar en elartículo consiste en la defiición de las principales limitaciones alos preacuerdos y el allanamiento a los cargos en la dinámicadel sistema acusatorio colombiano, organizadas a manerade categorías, y con apoyo en los principales fallos de lajurisprudencia penal sobre la materia, y discurriendo asimismosobre la justifiación de tales limitaciones.En suma, el artículo logra demostrar que el conjunto delimitantes a la libertad de las partes en el ejercicio de las formasde terminación anticipada del proceso penal, obedece alcumplimiento de los fies esenciales del proceso penal en el marcode la Carta Política, y contribuye además a organizar de formacategorizada los campos de acción que no pueden soslayar laspartes cuando acuden a estos mecanismos de justicia premial.Palabras clave: Allanamiento unilateral, justicia premial,preacuerdos y negociaciones, sistema acusatorio, terminaciónanticipada del proceso penal.2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657599(Revista) ISSN 2346-0792(Revista) ISSN 1794-1598Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2014, pags. 115-125spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|