La moción de censura: ¿constructiva u "obstructiva"?
At the end of the Weimar Rrepublic, the political instability caused by the parliamentary inefficiency to grant a solid confidence upon the different governments led to the reconsideration of a classical parliamentary institution: the vote of no confidence. Ddeparting from those first reflections, A...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5028545 |
| Fuente: | Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 35, Nº 103, 2015, pags. 87-109 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
At the end of the Weimar Rrepublic, the political instability caused by the parliamentary inefficiency to grant a solid confidence upon the different governments led to the reconsideration of a classical parliamentary institution: the vote of no confidence. Ddeparting from those first reflections, Aarticle 67 of the Bbonn Bbasic Law established the so-called «constructive» vote of no confidence, a figure that was later adopted by Aart. 113 of the Spanish Constitution. Since then, this way of understanding the institution �an exception among the different Cconstitutional systems� has been defended alleging the serious problems that may be avoided. Nnevertheless, it has also been criticized for the serious burdens that puts before the task of overthrowing weak governments. Tthe following pages seek to examine the reasons for and against the constructive vote of no confidence and to reach a judgement upon the convenience of mantaining it |
|---|