La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo

This chapter maintains that the adversarial and inquisitorial categories have been more central to comparative criminal procedure than it has been previously acknowledged because they have contributed to constitute it as a transnational field by reflecting and restricting its main theoretical trends...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Langer, Máximo
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Los Andes 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4760234
Source:Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 32, 201434 pags.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000664427
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 32, 201434 pags.
language
Spanish
topic
Acusatorio
inquisitivo
sistema acusatorio
sistema inquisitivo
proceso penal
proceso penal comparado
derecho comparado
reforma judicial
Adversarial
inquisitorial
adversary system
inquisitorial system
criminal procedure
comparative criminal procedure
comparative law
judicial reform
Acusatório
inquisitivo
sistema acusatório
sistema inquisitivo
processo penal
processo penal comparado
direito comparado
reforma judicial
spellingShingle
Acusatorio
inquisitivo
sistema acusatorio
sistema inquisitivo
proceso penal
proceso penal comparado
derecho comparado
reforma judicial
Adversarial
inquisitorial
adversary system
inquisitorial system
criminal procedure
comparative criminal procedure
comparative law
judicial reform
Acusatório
inquisitivo
sistema acusatório
sistema inquisitivo
processo penal
processo penal comparado
direito comparado
reforma judicial
Langer, Máximo
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
description
This chapter maintains that the adversarial and inquisitorial categories have been more central to comparative criminal procedure than it has been previously acknowledged because they have contributed to constitute it as a transnational field by reflecting and restricting its main theoretical trends and thematic interests. The article identifyies the main theoretical traditions of this field by mapping commentators� and courts� uses of the adversarial and inquisitorial distinction, and shows that even the main comparative criminal procedure alternative approaches are operating within these same theoretical traditions. The article suggests that the adversarial-inquisitorial dichotomy has also contributed to limit the type of themes that the field has covered. Finally, the article sketches a number of ways in which comparative criminal procedure may transcend the long theoretical and thematic shadow of the adversarial and inquisitorial categories and thus expand the type of positive and normative insights it can bring to our understanding of the criminal process.
format
Article
author
Langer, Máximo
author_facet
Langer, Máximo
author_sort
Langer, Máximo
title
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
title_short
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
title_full
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
title_fullStr
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
title_full_unstemmed
La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
title_sort
la larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo
publisher
Universidad de Los Andes
publishDate
2014
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4760234
_version_
1709712859900936192
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00006644272019-02-21La larga sombra de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivoLanger, MáximoAcusatorioinquisitivosistema acusatoriosistema inquisitivoproceso penalproceso penal comparadoderecho comparadoreforma judicialAdversarialinquisitorialadversary systeminquisitorial systemcriminal procedurecomparative criminal procedurecomparative lawjudicial reformAcusatórioinquisitivosistema acusatóriosistema inquisitivoprocesso penalprocesso penal comparadodireito comparadoreforma judicialThis chapter maintains that the adversarial and inquisitorial categories have been more central to comparative criminal procedure than it has been previously acknowledged because they have contributed to constitute it as a transnational field by reflecting and restricting its main theoretical trends and thematic interests. The article identifyies the main theoretical traditions of this field by mapping commentators� and courts� uses of the adversarial and inquisitorial distinction, and shows that even the main comparative criminal procedure alternative approaches are operating within these same theoretical traditions. The article suggests that the adversarial-inquisitorial dichotomy has also contributed to limit the type of themes that the field has covered. Finally, the article sketches a number of ways in which comparative criminal procedure may transcend the long theoretical and thematic shadow of the adversarial and inquisitorial categories and thus expand the type of positive and normative insights it can bring to our understanding of the criminal process.Este trabalho argumenta que podem ser identificadas as principais tradições teóricas dentro das quais o direito processual penal comparado tem trabalhado, mediante um relevamento dos usos que a doutrina e a jurisprudência lhe têm dado à distinção entre acusatório e inquisitivo. Depois de efetuar este relevamento, afirma-se que inclusive as principais análises do direito processual penal comparado que têm usado términos ou ferramentas conceituais alternativas à oposição acusatório-inquisitivo operam dentro destas mesmas tradições teóricas. Além disso, se aduz que a dicotomia acusatório-inquisitivo também tem contribuído a limitar o tipo de temas ou questões tratados pelo direito processual penal comparado. Finalmente, esboçam-se diversas maneiras mediante as quais o direito processual penal comparado pode superar a longa sombra das categorias acusatório-inquisitivo e assim expandir e enriquecer nosso conhecimento e análise, tanto positivos quanto normativos, sobre o processo penal.Este trabajo argumenta que las categorías acusatorio e inquisitivo han sido más centrales para el derecho procesal penal comparado que lo que se ha reconocido previamente ya que han contribuido a constituirlo y a moldearlo como campo transnacional al reflejar y restringir sus principales tendencias teóricas y sus mayores temas de interés. Se identifican las principales tradiciones teóricas de este campo mediante un relevamiento de los usos que la doctrina y la jurisprudencia le han dado a la distinción entre acusatorio e inquisitivo, y se argumenta que incluso los principales análisis alternativos existentes operan dentro de estas mismas tradiciones teóricas. Además, se aduce que la dicotomía acusatorio-inquisitivo también ha contribuido a limitar el tipo de temas tratados por este campo. Finalmente, se esbozan diversas maneras mediante las cuales el derecho procesal penal comparado puede superar la larga sombra teórica y temática de las categorías acusatorio-inquisitivo y así expandir y enriquecer nuestro conocimiento y análisis, tanto positivos como normativos, sobre el proceso penal.Universidad de Los Andes2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4760234(Revista) ISSN 1909-7778Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 32, 201434 pags. spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI